• A Literary Magazine | Honest Reflections on Life's Leisurely Diversions

A to Z

Falmouth

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

Falmouth

by Dave Fromm

One time my uncle invited me and my cousin Mark to come down to Cape Cod and run in the Falmouth Road Race, a 7-mile “fun run” held every August. My uncle had been running it for years and Mark was a really serious runner. I was not a runner so I said thanks but no thanks and they went ahead with their plans. Then at the last minute Mark had to bail out and my uncle was going to have to run by himself so I said sure I’ll take Mark’s spot even though, being from western Massachusetts, I’m opposed to Cape Cod on principle.  Also I hadn’t trained at all, but this was several years ago, right around the end of the part of my life when I thought I could still do things like that.

I made my wife and kids come and we stayed with my aunt and uncle the night before the race. They made a big pasta dinner and we drank lots of Gatorade and beer to hydrate. Very early the next morning my uncle and I got up, drank some coffee and went down to meet a bunch of runners on buses that took us to the start. The buses smelled like Vaseline. I pinned Mark’s registration bib to the front of my t-shirt and ate a granola bar. Then we got into the corrals for the race.

The run began with a long gradual hill which transitioned into a series of rolling woodland hills and then into a very short, steep hill right at the end where terrible people lined the course and yelled at you if you started walking. In between the hills was a long stretch of beachfront where the sun and the salt air combined to suck all the moisture out of your body. The race had something like 14,000 runners and they ran the gamut from Kenyans to people in lobster costumes. I was passed by several people in lobster costumes. Spectators would yell “Come on, Mark! That guy’s wearing a costume!” and I felt bad for this Mark sucker until I remembered that I was wearing a bib with my cousin’s name on it. It was a really long, hot, depressing, and exhausting run. My uncle finished several minutes ahead of me.

At the finish, there was a big expo with food and vendors and music and we got water and more Gatorade and a free hot dog and parts of oranges and bagels. We reconvened with our families in the middle of the field, nursed our strained muscles and congratulated ourselves on surviving. Then we headed towards the cars to drive back to my uncle’s place.

Almost as soon as we left the post-race grounds, I started feeling nauseous, as if my whole body was unraveling from an hour-long clench. The race was so crowded that my wife had had to park almost a half-mile away in a residential neighborhood where every spot of median had a car on it. As I limped behind her, my stomach began to churn. I was glad we were heading back. The immediate future felt ominous and nobody wants to face something ominous in a porta-john at a 14,000-person expo.

“We need to get to my uncle’s,” I said.
“That’s what we’re trying to do,” said my wife.

By the time we reached the car I was cramping up. My wife got behind the wheel and the kids buckled themselves into their car seats. I slid into the passenger side.
“Drive as quick as you can,” I said.

The problem was there was nowhere to go. The neighborhood was a cul-de-sac and cars were bumper-to-bumper all the way around. It took us 20 minutes just to back out of the spot we were in.

I’d stopped sweating around mile 5 but sitting there started to sweat again. The waves of distress were building upon each other. I looked around the neighborhood but it was all residential — no convenience stores, no public libraries, not even a construction site. At that point I would have leapt at the porta-johns at the expo, but they were a half mile away and I no longer had that kind of range.

My wife started to laugh in the desperate way one might if suddenly forced to consider something previously unthinkable happening. The traffic wasn’t moving. We would creep forward, then stop. Creep, then stop. Some stops were short, some stretched into minutes. There was no way to measure progress.

Finally, with the main road still nowhere in sight, everything inside me went silent. But it wasn’t a peaceful quiet. It felt ominous, the quiet of a horror movie right before the jump scare. Except this jump scare would be intestinal. Metaphorically at least, the s- was about to hit the fan. Possibly the radiator.

On our right was a big family picnicking in the front yard of one of those classic clapboard Cape houses.
“I’ve got to ask them,” I said to my wife.
She didn’t say anything. She just stared straight ahead.

I got out of the car and walked quickly up to the family.
They looked at me.
“Hi,” I said, sort of wildly. “Sorry to bother you. It’s just, a long line of cars, you know?”
They didn’t respond, so I cut to the chase.
“And I was wondering if I could, uh, borrow your bathroom real quick?”

Borrow was a funny word to use about a bathroom, partly because it implied that I’d be returning it in the same condition, which wasn’t the case. Perhaps intuiting this, the grandfather in the lawn chair grimaced. It must have been his house. For a second, I thought maybe he was going to say no but he seemed like the kind of person who could recognize an emergency when he saw one. Maybe he was a veteran.
“Lot of Gatorade,” I said, hoping to create a sort of illusion.

The grandfather tilted his head toward the door and one of the younger women said, “I’ll show you where it is.”
She led me inside and pointed up a flight of stairs to an open door.
“Right there,” she said.

I thanked her and got up the stairs as fast as my condition allowed. Their upstairs bathroom was small and nondescript, and I have never felt more grateful to be in a stranger’s home. I locked the door and opened the back window. The episode was dreadful, but as these things go, over in seconds. When I looked for a way to cover my tracks, all I could find was a Cosmopolitan magazine atop the toilet tank.  I used it as a fan. It didn’t help.

I washed up, closed the door and raced back down the stairs and across the yard.
“Thank you so much,” I shouted, waving to the family on their picnic blankets. They waved back.

“That was quick,” said my wife.
I wiped the sweat off of my brow.
“Get us out of here,” I said.
She nodded.  But there was still nowhere to go.

We sat in the car, right in front of the house, for another 20 minutes, as members of the family went inside and came back out looking aghast. The grandfather’s grimace deepened, and he stared at me like I’d betrayed the platoon. I slunk low in my seat and looked straight ahead until he finally drifted out of sight.

Sometimes I think about that man and his house and his kind family. I wonder whether they gather every year for the Falmouth Road Race and, if they do, whether they tell the story of year a guy jumped out of a car after the race and bombed their lovely upstairs bathroom. I hope they can look back on that event and laugh about it. What a crazy thing! When I look back on it, it’s utterly mortifying, and the only silver lining I can see is that at least they still think that that guy’s name was Mark.

Dave Fromm is the author of a sports memoir entitled Expatriate Games, which chronicles his season playing semi-pro basketball in the Czech Republic in the mid-1990s, and a novel entitled The Duration.  He lives in Western Massachusetts with his wife and kids.

Mid-Range Essay Contest Winner

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

BERNIE’S HOLE:

A Meditation on the Almost-Superman, or Maybe Just on Clark Kent 

Kent H. Dixon                          

       It’s a river-wide dam of corrugated and bolted steel that was designed to take pressure off a water main about 30 feet upstream.
~Bernie, on the dam at Bernie’s Hole

If you think you’re going to die, you’re probably right.
                                                      ~Kayaker wisdom

I’ve nearly drowned a couple of times in my life, once when I was 17 and more recently at 71 — bookends those numbers, a palindrome like kayak. The recent episode entailed kayaking on the Mad River (through Dayton, Ohio), which they say really was quite mad maybe a century ago, but nowadays the stretch I run doesn’t get much above a Class II, with a couple of Class III spots — a few rapids, a man-made standing wave, and a rather nasty low head dam — the one in the epigraph.

The ‘Bernie’ of my title runs the shop where we rent our boats, and for $2, if you BYOB, provides the shuttle up river to the put-in. And a ‘hole’ as anyone who canoes, rafts, or kayaks in white water well knows, is most any kind of hydraulic that, through tricky water dynamics, creates a circulating backwash contrary to the main stream flow, and often as well to the health and welfare of the boater. Holes come in all shapes and sizes, and yak jockeys use them to propel their stunts; but experts know the score and do their best to avoid the really angry ones, the ‘keepers.’

And a hole is just that — a foamed-over depression in the surface caused by the water flowing over an obstacle and smashing down with enough force to approach the bottom, but then instead of ricocheting off the bottom and moving on downstream, it bounces back up and since there’s more water piled up in front of it (downstream), it follows the path of least resistance and folds back upstream, toward the obstacle; where it meets up with the water pouring over the top and so on thus creating a cycle, a kind of vigorous whirl pool on its side, circulating counterclockwise. You and your boat can get trapped in such a circulation. You flip over. Rolling back up doesn’t help much because you’re dragged back toward the over-pouring current which flips you over again. Round and round you go, and where you stop — well, you don’t. Fish drown in these holes — from exhaustion.

A hole can be a kind of fence, too, running along the whole base of a low head dam from shore to opposite shore — like the one in my epigraph though that one is far more intimidating for its look than its actual dynamic. It’s the corrugated and bolted steel that’s arresting. Stretches of it, corroded and tree-battered, look like crazy traffic spikes. Foot-long rusting claws reaching up and curling toward you. It’s easy enough to see why Bernie won’t let his boats go over it in low water.

But me and my charges (a novice couple and their two children) were in our own boats and there are open places, river center and another to river left. I’ve taken both openings many times and I know where to go, but high and low water can completely change a waterscape — you wouldn’t know it’s the same river sometimes — and after I’d shepherded the family through and it came my turn, I spotted what I thought was a was a nice chubby ‘green tongue’ wagging out into down stream. Tongues are good because you can count on this longitudinal swell of green water: clear passage — just mount it and slide on down.     

Thing is, in this instance what I’d thought was a greeny tongue was really a ‘pillow.’ The wave ‘pillows up’ on the upstream side of a barely submerged rock. I’d never seen this one before because I hadn’t been on the water when it was this low — a new rock, so to speak. So I crest over the dam, ably aiming my boat toward this inviting “tongue” and plow headlong into this lurking rock. The current takes my stern and now I’m sideways and I know not to lean toward the upstream current, which will flip me quicker than a finger snap, but . . . that must have been what happened. I flipped, slam, in less time than it takes to say Oh, shit! David Quammen in his essay “Vortex” puts it aptly:   “. . . snapping you upside down so fast you’ll think Shaquille O’Neal has slam-dunked your head into a Maytag.”

And now in your Maytag world it’s all about maniacal bubbles and muffled thuds and a crashing about your head and ears as if you’d submerged in a hot tub with half a dozen waterfalls for jets. Quammen again: “For a rough approximation of how it feels to drop into a hole, you could take a pass through the car wash on your bicycle.” The American Canoe Association’s manual on kayaking: “A person caught in the re-circulating portion of the hydraulic may re-circulate endlessly. An unaided person usually drowns.”

There wasn’t time to think of drowning. If it did cross my mind, it was a distant thought, as remote as death is most of the time. Drowning and Death were off tail-gating somewhere. I’m being facetious analytically: this cavalier shrug at one’s danger is probably both necessary and natural. It would be a complete waste of time to worry about drowning, when you’re actually/maybe/probably about to; there are other things you’d best be doing.

I did think about rolling as the seething retro-circulation robo-circulated me, and decided against it. There was this half-ton of water pouring down on top of me; I’d just go over again. Twice I remember as I came around, leveraging on my paddle to lift up enough to snatch a breath underneath the pour-over, my head being behind the small waterfall — a little bit of air space (charmingly called a ‘grotto’), between the cascade and the structure and I took comfort in it. ‘Remember this next time you come around, Kent.’ I actually had a half-thought like that. Gee, I could do this all day, or at least until the cavalry came. Calling on the sardonic there, I think gave me the smidgen of thinking time that may have saved me. It’s not counter-productive to keep your sense of humor in these things, however dark.  (Cf. second epigraph above. Another piece of kayak advice I love, on the matter of self-rescue: ‘Don’t give up. You might get lucky.’)

But if I weren’t going to roll, then it was time to get out, so I wet-exited. You pull this handy rip-cord on the front of your spray skirt, and the rubber skirt peels off and the water rushes into the cockpit so fast that you’re flushed out of it in a second or two. So now I’m going round and round outside my boat, bumpity-bump and loud as a passing train. Why wasn’t I wearing my helmet? A learning moment, because now my boat felt like it had turned on me, some gigantic mad child pounding me about my head, chest, face, shoulders, back, knees . . . I had to hold it off.

But it was a new boat! I wasn’t about to leave it to become minced-Kevlar. So I muscled her into some sort of right angle to the dam, me underneath embracing my Baby Blue above me, and thrust from a squat to a plunge with all my might . . . and out we went. That is, next moment, there’s a haze of froth and I’m spitting a bit, but I’m moving downstream again and it doesn’t sound like I’m inside a tornado any more.

And that should be it. I goofed, had an accident, that might have killed me, but pulled out of it, recovered, am here to tell about it. Except, I didn’t entirely recover. It was more than four hours later when I was finally home sitting in my leather chair, which is about five feet from the granite island in the middle of the kitchen, when suddenly comes the river again, snatches of it, the feel of it and . . . what’s this, a bit of childhoo’…no, that’s Iowa Cit’.. no, that’s . . . water gnashing at my ear. Mentally it was like being in the hole again but battered by random memories and visual bites from anywhere, everywhere, from my life or apparently some stranger’s, in lieu of the turbulent roiling water. It was horrible. It was Alzheimer’s meets LSD. It was so bad I couldn’t make the distance from my chair to the island, got lost in thought only nothing so coherent as thought — flickering nano-bites of half-formed memory and intention, too fast to hold in the mind’s eye and then immediately eluding the mind’s recall, all at once! Like a snow globe in fast forward. I do remember articulating this thought: If I hit my head today and this is the new normal, I’m out of here, I’ll kill myself. I sure can’t live this way.

PTSD, everyone tells me later. I suppose, though nothing like the debilitating military disorder; maybe just a first step in that direction, but I must say, it held some fascination (after the fact). I dropped acid a few times in my 1960s youth: none of those trips was as intense or unhinging as the black hole of kaleidoscopic-consciousness that opened up four hours after I’d spent about a minute in a hydraulic hole. I’m not really recommending it, just telling you it’s there if you’re into experimenting with chemical stimulants. This one’s organic.

What’s an adrenaline junkie all about anyway — cortisol and adrenaline gushing into the bloodstream, vessels constricting, endorphins splurging, heart rate climbing to a fanfare of the Lone Ranger, lungs pulsing in concert — all that extra O2 massing at the heart the lungs — your own circulatory system saying to hell with the extremities (hence the clammy hands and dry mouth). They say the rush is better than crack cocaine, and we all know the woebegone truth about crack: you’re doomed to chasing down your first high; it’s never quite as good ever after. Hence in extremis, your ice climber, hang glider, windsurfer, et al. have to move on to the next bigger thrill-maker, their own sport’s equivalents of base-jumping or the like — BASE as in Buildings, Antennae, Spans, Earth — places it’s best to leap from, provided they’re at least a 1,000 feet high, enough for a parachute to open.

There is no other feeling as intense — a given. Also Googledom has it that these crazy brave hearts are driven to the ultimate for two main reasons — the competition and the respect, this latter, the admiration of the other 99.06 percent of the population, far outweighing the winning. And one supposes that winning finally promotes to your own personal best each time anyway, a photo-finish with death a close second.

I was watching a Dane Jackson video recently — I’ve been a fan of this guy since he was 10, in his father’s commercial how-to videos on rolling and play boating—and in this one he’s collecting waterfalls. These are 50 to 100 foot drops in your kayak over massive waterfalls, all around the world. Dane:

They are terrifying, stressful1 . . . but getting through a day like
that uninjured is just unreal2. The last time I went hunting for
waterfalls in the southeast I ran the 90 foot Noccalulah, and did
two runs on the 80 foot Desoto.3 This time I got the 100 foot Ozone
and 70 foot Cane Creek.4 I wonder what the next search will bring.5

The profile rather leaps out at you:

  1. the promulgation — somebody needs to know; you wouldn’t do it in secret. Most practitioners are sporting Go-Pros.
  2. the risk factor, stated, admitted. Honored, even.
  3. past glories: not dealing w a newbie here. This is an expert, w a record to beat,
  4. and it must needs beat the past ones: bigger and better, each time, every time;
  5. and finally, what’s next? Bring ’em on.

This craving for respect, what the ancient Greeks called honor, may be the common denominator for our virtual-supermen; the admirers’ responses vary. Many people do admire, even honor and revere, the super-heroism. But there’s a spectrum, too; some people turn away, like shying away from an accident about to happen. And plenty of people get downright angry: they condemn the tom-foolery of it, harshly, I think to protect themselves from any empathy or proxy thrill. That’s how close they don’t want to get: don’t even let it enter your sympathetic nerve endings. The one doing a free-solo climb on the underside of a projecting spar, like a spider . . .  Looking at the pictures, I feel a queasiness bordering on nausea, and then dismissive disgust. Is he still alive? Probably not. Do I care? I’m not disrespecting him, just tracking my feelings.

But the waterfalls I can dig (word choice?). Having run a couple of two and three foot ones, I need only multiply by 30 and remember to throw my paddle away — you don’t want to land on your paddle after an 89-foot drop, or grip it too hard and have your arm wrenched off. Plus, on the matter of landing, Plan B is reassuring: I know I can swim.

But I can’t fly. That guy that based-jumped off a point 3,500 feet above the floor of Yosemite Valley — and didn’t make it. Dean Potter, with a nice memoriam in MensJournal.com. Elsewhere in BASE lore there’s a review of a documentary of the Boenishes’ story, Carl (deceased) and Jean (still jumping) — ‘the godparents of BASE jumping.’ Reviewing this Sunshine Superman, Frances Dodds wraps up with exploring the why of it all — not just the heroes’ why, but ours. Our meaning, in their seemingly super-human feats. Their deaths, she proposes, are just half the equation; the other half transcends our mourning them because:

These men died young, but they chose to live their lives in a way
that makes it impossible for others to shout and shake their fists to
the heavens when it turned out they weren’t superhuman after all.

We don’t let Potter and the rest be laid to rest: we tribute-mourn them by absorbing them into our most ideal (most heroic) selves. This was Achilles’ heroic choice: stay at Troy and kill Hector, and be on people’s lips today, 3,000 years later. Or take your armor and go home, let Hector live and Achilles retire in forgotten ordinariness.

I don’t know. I won’t remember Potter as long as I will Achilles, nor even as long as Falstaff — ‘Discretion is the better part of valor.’ (Homer and Shakespeare—it strikes me I set my own bar rather high.) Just go ahead and let the Supermen fly their thing, I say. Let the Class V rapids roar maniacally on (without me), let one’s life flash before one’s eyes under the red glow of a final Exit sign, this particular Superman prefers sitting behind the mild-mannered reporter’s desk, gathering and purveying the news, mentally undressing Lois Lane in the bargain, no doubt. The muse loves the breed of harpers, says Homer. They, too, deserve time — honor,  “…for they are dearest to the Muse who puts upon their lips the ways of life.”

And you don’t have to die young in the middle of it. And, be it noted, the relationship here is symbiotic: your hero and your bard are profoundly dependent upon each other. Like love and marriage — no, you can’t have one, you can’t have one without the other.

 

Kent Dixon has been published in all genres, though mostly fiction in the likes of Georgia Review, Iowa Review, Antioch Review, TriQuarterly, Shenandoah, Gettysburg Review, Carolina Quarterly. His nonfiction has appeared in Kansas Quarterly, Energy Review, The American Prospect, and Grand Tour. His awards and grants included three from the Ohio Arts Council (3), three Pushcart nominations, and a finalist at Midwest Quarterly novella contest. He won Story magazine’s Love Story Competition (1995) and has been named in the back of Best American Essays, Best American Short Stories, and Martha Foley Best. He teaches creative writing and white water kayaking at Wittenberg University in Springfield, Ohio.

Longform Creative Nonfiction and Featured Poet Contests

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

For our first print issue of 2021, a summer offering, we’re expanding our pages a bit to include longform creative nonfiction (essays of 6,000 to 10,000 words) and a featured poet (with half a dozen poems). Congratulations to Dave Fromm for his winning essay, “Tool Town Left to Its Own Devices.” Glenn Stowell will be our featured poet. Thanks to everyone who entered. And special thanks to Frank Van Zant and Ben Giamo, our judges.

Stay tuned for future contests.

Frank Van Zant, our poetry editor, will judge the anonymous poetry finalists, selected by our other editors. Ben Giamo, a Sport Literate veteran and one of our “Best Americans,” will serve as a our guest judge for the essays. Ben is an Emeritus Professor of American Studies at Notre Dame University. He is the author of several books: On the Bowery: Confronting Homelessness in American SocietyBeyond Homelessness: Frames of ReferenceThe Homeless of IronweedKerouac, the Word and the Way: Prose Artist as Spiritual QuesterNotes from the Bowery; and Homeless Come Home: An Advocate, the Riverbank, and Murder in Topeka, Kansas.

In general, here are some rules to live and submit by:

  • We think the $21 pot builder is reasonable (we usually break even), and the cost of a standard subscription is $20.
  • Previously published work is acceptable. Just let us know who had it first so we can give them credit should you win or we publish it.
  • Poets should send six poems per entry. No more, no less. Please put them all in one Word document.
  • Writers can send one essay per entry. Enter as many times as you like.
  • We’ll consider a chapter or some part of a book-length project, though your essay should read as a standalone piece.
  • All entries will be considered for standard publication.
  •  Should you need to resubmit your entry for whatever reason (from typos to life-changing perspectives), simply email the editor (billsportliterate@gmail.com). You can send something anew.
  • Submissions should come through Submittable.
  • Don’t forget to tell us the two back issues you’d like to receive. We’d even send them to a friend, noting your thoughtfulness.
  • We can send back issues to U.S. domestic issues only. So if you live abroad, maybe you’ve got a cousin in the States.

Back-Issue Bonanza:

  • “Another Issue of the Big Shoulders”: This special Chicago issue features a photo essay on yesteryear women in sports from the Chicago History Museum. Michael W. Cox shares an unexpected encounter on a basketball court. And William Meiners, SL editor,  attempts his best George Plimpton as a hamstrung tight end for the semi-pro Lafayette Lions.

 

  • “Our Football Best 2008”: Contest winner Robert Reichle’s “Football Heaven” highlights this special football collective. Ken Rodgers interviews Steve Sabol of “NFL Films.” Plus, Benedict Giamo’s Best American Essay noteworthy “Played Out” makes much out of pigskin. Yes, that’s the same Ben judging this contest!

  • “Fallout 2018”: This issue features two particularly good football essays from our contest winner Todd Davis and Virginia Ottley Craighill. “The Lost Cause,” Virginia’s essay, was anthologized in Best American Sports Writing 2019.

 

  • “25th Anniversary Issue”: Our 2020 issue, which you can also sample a bit online, is full of great essays and poetry, including three contest winners: Hal Ackerman, Jack Bedell, and Sage Marshall.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Squash on the Hill

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

by Caitlin Dwyer

  • This story was originally drafted as part of Creative Nonfiction‘s Writing Pittsburgh project.

Marlon is hurt. Or so he says, limping into the squash court, an exaggerated look of pain contorting his face. Coach Samantha Rosado takes one look at him and says, “Hustle up, Marlon. Okay, everybody, what’s next?”

A chorus of voices echoes around the enclosed court: “High skips!”

It’s warm-up time at Steel City Squash.  Sixth-graders are lined up against the wall, fidgeting. When Rosado calls, “Go!” the students bolt forward, their kneecaps lifting high. There’s a lot of groaning. One girl waits until Rosado isn’t looking and then walks. Marlon refuses to skip, his toes dragging along the wood, grimacing. The other students are already back to the wall by the time Marlon is halfway done.

From the wall, a short kid with an oversized yellow t-shirt tucked into his athletic pants starts yelling. “Hurry up, hurry up! Quit draggin’!”

Marlon winces and limps toward the wall.

“You’re wasting squash time!” the short kid yells. His name is Tai’Mere Thompson; at 11, he’s a veteran of the squash team here and clearly feels some authority on the court.

“Shut up!” Marlon shoots back.

“Against the wall,” Rosado orders. She has already told Marlon that he can sit out if he feels hurt, but that he can’t play a game without warming up.

“Quit wasting time!” Tai’Mere repeats, and despite an admonition to keep quiet he yells on, and Marlon yells back, and pretty soon the two of them are screaming at each other. Rosado orders Marlon off the court to cool down, and he stomps off, fuming, while Tai’Mere begins his next set of drills.

Tai’Mere and his teammates come from the Hill District, a primarily African-American neighborhood in the heart of Pittsburgh. The area has some of the city’s prime real estate: rising out of downtown with views north and south. It also has some of the worst poverty and violence in the city. Three times a week, a small group of kids from the Hill District are shuttled to the University of Pittsburgh, where they are taught the basics of squash, a racquetball-like game popular in prep schools, and mentored in skills for academic success.

Steel City Squash (SCS) arrived in Pittsburgh’s Hill District in 2014, when Tai’Mere and Marlon were in fifth grade. Modeled after similar after-school enrichment programs in Boston, New York, Baltimore and Chicago, the nonprofit deliberately targeted the Hill, trying to find a place where squash would stand out.

“It is totally unknown. Squash is a white male elite culture, says SCS Squash Director Samantha Rosado.  “A lot of the top colleges have squash programs, and a lot of them recruit from urban squash teams. There are a lot of scholarships… It’s essentially a way to get them to college.”

Squash may seem like a strange sport for the Hill, but that’s the point, says Jeremy Feinstein, Secretary of the Board at SCS. “It’s harnessing the traditional elitism of the sport itself,” he told me. “If you’re a college admissions officer and you find a kid from the Hill District, and not only have they done pretty well in school but they’re a squash player? That’s not what you’re expecting to see.”

The program is held at the old Fitzgerald Field House, tucked behind an indoor track and the well-lit, broad expanse of the volleyball courts. The staircase is dark and narrow. After practice, I find 11-year-old Marlon, evicted from practice for yelling, sitting on the steps with his head in his hands, crying softly.

“I always get in trouble,” he says, his voice muffled by his hands. “I got in trouble every day for a year. I keep getting blamed.”  He looks up with big, round, desperately sad eyes. His hands lie upturned on his thighs. “It’s just gonna be like this my whole life. I’m gonna go to jail for something I didn’t do.”

The stakes at squash practice are not who learns to serve better, or who makes the team; they are the confidence and conviction of a boy who doesn’t believe he has a choice. What Rosado and the rest of the staff at Steel City Squash are fighting against is the proposition that the fates of these kids are already mapped out. They propose an alternate plan, one of achievement. They are fighting not only the pitfalls of poverty, which lock people into their own geography in a narrow way, but a larger system: one that repeatedly reminds kids of how little they matter.

***

Steel City Squash (SCS) was, in the beginning, basically a one-man show: executive director Brad Young had come from New York, where he had worked on a similar urban squash program in Harlem. Young is my brother-in-law, a dapper white guy prone to bow ties and boat shoes. That first year, he sought foundational support, set up facilities, and hired staff. He bought a bus. He went throughout the Hill District to recruit students, speaking at assemblies and local events.

SCS aimed to provide the structure and skill sets to get poor and minority youth to college. The program recruits students in late elementary and middle school and tracks with them through high school and beyond. The goal is not to craft professional squash players; it’s to hook kids into a program that will guide them academically.

The model is effective — 95 percent of students who graduate an urban squash program matriculate into a college of some kind, according to the National Urban Squash & Education Association (NUSEA), the umbrella organization that oversees 20 programs in the U.S. That’s a high rate; nationally, low-income students enter college at around 50 percent, whereas high-income students matriculate at around 80 percent, according to FiveThirtyEight.com.

Athletics attract the kids, but the long-term academic focus is what gets parents on board. By the time the kids graduate from high school, they will have spent eight or nine years receiving intensive tutoring. “It’s primarily an academic program,” says Valeria McCrary, SCS Academic Director. “You have to be consistent; you have to be committed. That way, we can really work on getting you to college.”

Exposure to resources and new ideas helps kids cross the boundaries set by poverty, geography, and society. Rather than developing the neighborhood’s buildings or roads — changing the literal map of the Hill District — SCS wants to redraw mental maps. Over time, the program will transform these kids —  physically, as they begin to train for a sport; mentally, as they learn discipline and self-confidence, and as they begin to build pieces of their adolescent identity.

When I first arrived at SCS, I worried that the price of success, for Tai’Mere and his teammates, would be a dissociation from their own neighborhood. They would be transformed into college-ready scholar-athletes, but only if they were willing to let squash, with its popped-collar prep-school style, lay claim to some of the mental territory that was currently occupied by home-grown Hill District pride. So I asked Tai’Mere what he thought.

Tai’Mere has a sweet, open face that still carries its childlike fleshiness. The first time we met, he was kneeling on a swivel chair, peering over the back. During the interview, the swivel chair scooted a bit closer to me with each question; eventually, Tai’Mere had scooted all the way across the room to be next to me. His gaze was unapologetically direct. He wanted, I think, to make sure I was listening.

He jumped right into squash, he said, without knowing much about it. “I am reckless with food and sports,” he proclaimed, which seems appropriate; when he first heard about squash at school, Tai’Mere thought it was a vegetable. “We talking about FOOD?” He grinned at me, reenacting his confusion. Tai’Mere went home and asked his mother to sign him up. After learning that SCS included academic support, she agreed to enroll him.

Despite the foreignness of squash, he quickly claimed it as his own. “I felt like this was gonna be my sport,” he said. He started playing in the beginning of the fifth grade and by sixth grade, had earned his own racket – a prize gained after a full year in the program. As part of the “team,” which means he passed fitness tests and try-outs, Tai’Mere is now a big fan of the game that a year earlier was so unfamiliar to him. Being a professional squash player has become one of his life goals, after which he plans to retire and design his own athletic shoes.

Programs like SCS do change the way that students see themselves and their neighborhood. They can expose kids to teasing and bullying. But the kids coming to squash are not being transformed against their will, or their knowledge; they are actively claiming the sport as their own, and in doing so, they are establishing complex and sometimes conflicted identities.

***

“It’s a disaster!” Crystalina says, giving me a wry look. She points to the batter, goopy and lumpy, in a mixing bowl. We are standing in her kitchen in the Hill District —  there’s a big glass table, little apple-shaped ceramic dishes, and scattered bags of flour and sugar, vials of lemon essence, tins of cocoa and baking powder. It’s a school holiday, and Crystalina is baking a birthday cake for her father, who lives in another neighborhood.

At 12 years old, Crystalina Edmonds wants to be a baker. And a model-slash-actress. And a professional squash player. That last goal is a newer one, formed in the year since she joined Steel City Squash. Soft-spoken, self-proclaimed “shy,” she takes her time with her words, choosing them carefully. Yet she has a persistent curiosity that drives her to try new things despite her cautious nature — which is what drove her into squash, a sport she had never heard of before last year.

A lanky, pretty girl with delicate features and long braids, Crystalina lives with her grandmother in the heart of the Middle Hill. Her birth mother is not in the picture. Their narrow, brick-sided house stands alone in a weedy, overgrown field. Crystalina navigates her neighborhood block by block, house by house. She tours me around with a childlike sense of place: each home anchored to a past event, a particular character. She doesn’t know street names; she knows stories: “I sold candy to them. That’s my friend. I don’t know them, I know them. I don’t know those last two houses. My friend lives over here. I used to ride past them all the time, and that’s the little after-school program [where I used to go]. That, that, and that.”

“Do you like your neighborhood?” I ask her.

“Yeah…”  Her voice trails off. I ask why she hesitated.

“I’m not sure because the store up the street…it’s really crazy up there. They be shootin’. But down, like, where I live, just down the street, it’s all calm.”

This, too, is part of Crystalina’s map of the Hill: Chauncey Drive, a street that runs behind the Bedford Dwellings apartments, about three blocks from Crystalina’s house, is notorious for drugs and gun violence. She isn’t allowed to go to the store nearby to buy her baking supplies; she has to “keep straight” to another store for her flour and sugar. “They usually don’t shoot when I’m walking past,” she tells me. But nevertheless, she and grandmother, whom she calls Mom, have mapped out safe and unsafe routes, and Crystalina, like a princess in a fairy tale, stays on the paths marked safe and avoids the thorns and thickets. The demarcations matter. Even though violence is nearby, it feels far away from the areas that are known, safe, and peaceful.

“They’re neck and neck, but not really neck and neck.”  She touches her thumbs along their outer edges, making a flat surface across the backs of both hands, and I understand that she means the two areas are side-by-side. “It’s like you walking into a new world.”

This is another way of looking at the Hill: not as a single neighborhood, but as a series of pockets, individualized blocks, some of which are dangerous and some of which are family-oriented and full of children playing in their weedy yards and baking cakes. To set characteristics across the whole neighborhood is to miss the subtlety of walking it as a child: Here but not here. The candy shop. My friend’s house. The good store. The bad store. The noisy neighbors. The place with the funny Halloween decorations. The boring place.

The boring place is school: St. Benedict the Moor, a Catholic K-8 in the center of the Hill. A serious student, Crystalina is a member of the recorder society and a lover of languages (she is currently studying six languages via an app on her phone). Her curiosity makes her impatient, which is what makes school so boring. Take Spanish class, for example: “Everybody cuts her class, it’s the last period, they pay her no attention, so it’s really hard to learn. I don’t wanna listen no more!” She breaks into giggles, shy yet defiant.

This is part of Crystalina’s burgeoning adolescence: an impatience with adults that she feels are wasting her time. She wasn’t always sure, for instance, that squash was worth the time it demanded. When she first started at SCS, her main thought was, “When am I gonna go home?” She didn’t like the drills. “My arms started hurting… we had to do this thing where we bounce the ball and my arms were hurting the next day.”

The next time, however, she was convinced: “It was, like, fun…I was used to the pain.”  She added the Field House and Trees Hall, the university fitness center, to her mental list of places. Now, she travels there along the fixed route of the shuttle bus three times a week, and like her baking and her recorder and her language studies, she is mapping herself a new hobby, new habits, new goals.

Crystalina says that the SCS kids get teased at school. “They’re like squash isn’t even a sport,” she tells me. “I don’t say nothing. Well, you can say football ain’t a sport. I don’t even care to be in on that. It’s drama.”  Her posture is strong, evasive, almost defensive. She repeats again, with the deliberate apathy of adolescence: “I really don’t care.”

The cocoa frosting concocted, I bid Crystalina goodbye. She walks me to the door, explains how to drive back to the university, and stands on the porch watching me go, waving her long, thin arm.’

About an hour later, I see that I have a phone message from Crystalina. A little worried, I call her back. In her reserved way, she says simply, “I just wanted to make sure you got home safe.”

It is the first time I have ever had a twelve-year-old call to check up on me. A few minutes later, I get a text of the cake, HAPPY BIRTHDAY scrawled in goopy letters across the top.

***

“The Hill District is definitely a dangerous place,” says George Satler. A Pittsburgh homicide detective for 18 years, Satler has worked many cases on the Hill. Shootings are often drug-related and involve ongoing feuds that simmer and occasionally break into violence. Because of the unemployment rate, violence can occur any night of the week.

The surprising thing for Satler has been the pull the Hill exerts on people. When a homicide witness is placed in witness protection and offered relocation to another neighborhood, he says, they often decline. “They say, my cousins are back here, my relatives are back here, my friends are back here, all the businesses that I frequent are here… so I’m going to stay here,” Satler says. Even the financial support of witness protection – and the threat of retaliation for talking with police — isn’t enough to move people out of the neighborhood.

Perhaps that’s because, although rough, the Hill District is rich in community. In the 1930s and 40s, it was a center of culture. At Greenlee Field, the nation’s first electric stadium lights twinkled over the famed Pittsburgh Crawfords baseball team: Josh Gibson, Satchel Paige, and Cool Papa Bell ran the bases, then later the clubs on Center Street. Nighttime meant the tap of high-hats and the blare of trumpets, as Lena Horne, Count Basie, and Duke Ellington played the Hurricane Club, the Crawford Grill, the Melody Bar. Shoppers moved between immigrant Italian, Jewish, and African-American businesses and homes. The Pittsburgh Courier, a black newspaper with national distribution and influence, championed the Double V campaign during World War II: a two-fold victory against Hitler abroad and discrimination at home. The Hill had poverty, but also industry and identity.

These days, a close community inhabits the Hill, many of them generations born and raised in the neighborhood; it is both intimate and closed, cautiously welcoming but essentially self-contained. Many homes are vacant or dilapidated; their shutters sagging, their porches rotting. The brick homes were once stately, but are now surrounded by weedy lots. A bustling new YMCA shines with promise and welcomes kids to play. The small library across the street is quiet and calm. Some blocks feel lively and commercial; others feel sapped, enervated. For a kid in the Hill District, navigating the safe and unsafe spaces is part of growing up.

The neighborhood is wary of outsiders looking to rewrite the map for their own residents. In 1957, the Lower Hill was razed to make room for Pittsburgh’s Civic Arena. Businesses disappeared and homes were leveled. The incident infected the consciousness of the neighborhood. Murmurs about gentrification ripple and subside. Now when people come in looking to “change” the Hill, there is an understandable suspicion of their intentions.

If a program wanted to be a part of this Pittsburgh neighborhood, why choose squash as the catalyst for transformation? Why not football, baseball – sports deeply rooted in Pittsburgh’s own history and community? Among their peers, the SCS kids have encountered resistance to something seen as external and foreign. Like Crystalina, some of them ignore it; others succumb, quitting mid-season to try out for other sports. SCS’ enrollment dipped at the start of last basketball season, and they are still trying to make back their numbers.

***

“We got a lot of negative comments when we started. What is squash?  Why are you letting him play squash? You don’t even know what squash is — ” Temie Thompson’s voice rises.

“And you rippin on it — ” Tai’Mere jumps in eagerly, finishing his mother’s thought.

“And you’re talking negative about it. So I tell people about the program, but they really don’t take interest,” Temie concludes. She shakes her head, unsure if she wants to continue.

It’s a Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., and Temie looks tired. She wears a jean jacket and cute thick-rimmed glasses. We’re sitting in a classroom at Trees Hall, just up the street from the Hill. This tag team conversation between mother and son —  where the sentiments rocket back and forth, echoed and amplified — is common for Temie and Tai’Mere. They operate as a team (“I’m not a very good parallel parker, but this one talks me into the space —  and he’s only 11!” Temie claims), and the 6th grader seems to pick up naturally on what his mom needs, rushing into the conversation to support her.

Temie raised her sons in the Hill District. She herself was born in the neighborhood and adopted by her grandmother because her own parents struggled with addiction. Now she works at a bank to support the family and is also completing her schooling to become qualified as a paramedic. While she and Tai’Mere’s father agree on most parenting decisions, she remains the primary caretaker. She loves the long-term, personal approach at SCS, and that it keeps Tai’Mere out of trouble —  a more difficult task as he gets older.

For the moment, however, she looks hesitant. We’ve hit some kind of awkward moment, so I decide to venture a guess at what’s making her uncomfortable.

“It’s kind of a sport for rich white people,” I suggest, and a relieved smile breaks across her face.

“I didn’t want to say it, but we got a lot of, ‘That’s a white people sport, white people play that.’” She sighs. “No, all types of races play all types of things.” She supports her son in finding what works for him — even if it means being the odd one out.

When Tai’Mere goes to visit neighborhood friends at football practice, they rib him about squash: “They gonna say, what is squash, why you playing that dumb sport, you softie.” He narrates the conversation for me, but adds: “I ain’t paid them no attention, because they don’t even know what it is.”

And yet later, he admits that he “wants to try” football. His bravado about squash weakens. His dad promised, he says, to sign him up in the fall.

***

Enduring a bit of teasing is part of the deal. 19-year-old Elhadji Mare attended Harlem StreetSquash, a well-established urban squash program on which SCS is modeled. He is now a sophomore at Trinity College. Although he no longer plays tournament squash – Trinity has the best men’s team in the nation – he credits the Harlem program with helping him gain discipline and stay focused through high school. He got teased a little, but “there’s always going to be somebody teasing you about doing something different than what’s around your community,” he said.

That novelty — doing something different than your peers – may cause some rifts, but it is also what attracts. “It’s actually the first sport I ever played,” Brandy Williamson, another StreetSquash alum, told me. Several of the students I spoke with mentioned this idea – that squash was finally right, after more traditional activities had failed to engage them.

Urban squash programs are very effective in leveraging that interest. The goal is always college. Anyone who doesn’t fit that model, or that goal, can’t take part; and one of the criticisms that alumni have for urban squash is that the programs are narrow, aimed at one single mode of transformation. A student with goals to pursue art, or join the military, or learn a trade, might struggle with the constant college academics focus; as would students with other barriers on their time, such as those with families. Urban squash programs craft a certain type of student into a certain type of scholar-athlete, readying them for college life — but it isn’t a program that serves everyone. It serves a small group of committed kids, and usually the ones who stick with it are the ones who feel like they found their sport.

“It was so addicting. I just wanted to get better and better and better. I wanted to commit and get good at it,” Williamson told me. “It was just the perfect place for me.” She now plays competitively on the Mt. Holyoke women’s team. She adds that being a Harlem-born squash player isn’t as unusual as one would think.

“There’s so many urban squash players in college that most of my matches are with somebody that I know. It’s always cool to see somebody that you know on another team, and know that you came from a similar program,” she replied. “I take pride.”

***

It’s 3 p.m. and chaos reigns at St. Benedict the Moor: kids are darting in and out, school buses are idling, parents are trying to keep up. A teacher pulls aside a young lady for yelling in the hallway. Brad Young is networking the halls, shaking hands with a smiling parent and saying, “We’ll see you Saturday.”

St. Benedict the Moor fits SCS’ socio-economic profile. To send their students to the program, schools must have minimum 70 percent free and reduced lunch population. So far, SCS has three partner schools and a total of 37 students, with a goal of 45 by the end of the year. A few individuals come from other schools; to qualify for the program, they must speak English as a second language, be from a recognized minority group, or be the first from their family to go to college.

The squash kids spill out of classes in fits and starts. They wear blue slacks, white shirts, and plaid ties that look like miniature cravats. They seem uncontrollably excited and utterly bored at the same time.

We lead them outside and through the crowds and onto the mini-bus. Physically, they could walk to the SCS program. The distance is less than a mile and easily traversable for energetic young legs. But between here, the safety and structure of school, and there, the safety and structure of the university, there are too many distractions, too many offshoots in the wrong direction. So every day, SCS staff pick up the kids and drive them just five minutes to a world that is both proximate and new.

“It’s not really bussing these kids out of the mean streets of the inner city. It’s walkable. It’s an adjacent neighborhood,” says Jeremy Feinstein. “And yet the invisible boundary between a place like the Hill District and the University is vitally important to cross.”

Off the bus, kids straggle into a classroom and dump their backpacks into laundry baskets. Valeria McCrary moves with graceful reserve, greeting them and giving each student a little squirt of hand sanitizer. Some kids go to change into athletic clothes; others grab fruit from a basket. One girl is doing push-ups in the center of the room while someone else tries to stand on her back. Tai’Mere’s squash shoes — all team players get a standard pair — have been mixed up with another student, and he is running around lifting everyone’s feet up and peering at the soles for the initials Sharpied there, bemoaning the fact that his feet are the same size as a girl. Crystalina and her friend are applying perfumed lotion to their arms. McCrary approaches students individually, not intrusive but checking in, reminding, prodding, prompting, asking. Eventually, they start to take seats.

As the Academic Director at SCS, McCrary oversees the hour of homework help during the week and provides academic enrichment on weekends. She meets with families as well as the kids’ teachers from school. With a background in counseling, she focuses not just on academic skills but problem solving, self-discipline, and self-expression: “We’re trying to tackle the kids from a more holistic approach.”

Today, Crystalina is practicing spelling. She mutters under her breath, repeating the words. When McCrary calls her up to show her the Star Chart, Crystalina gets a smile on her face and bounces back to her seat. She has gold stars all across both Squash and Academics. McCrary likes to make sure the kids get positive feedback, and she calls parents regularly to inform them of their child’s progress in the program.

Tai’Mere has a spottier star chart — a few stars here and there, but some empty spaces, blank days. I ask McCrary about his progress.

“Tai’Mere…” She pauses, chuckling. “He does well academically, but the only thing that brings him down is his mouth. He talks a whole lot. He wants to say what he has to say before he forgets it, but sometimes it’s just not the right time. It’s getting him in trouble.”

With a Chicago Bulls hat strapped to his backpack and a reading assignment spread in front of him, Tai’Mere looks relatively quiet at the moment. He found his shoes; he was separated from another girl for tickling her, then from another boy for bothering him; and now he’s reading about the history of video games. After a long silence, he looks up from his homework: “Did you know that the first video game ever made was in 1958?”

McCrary raises her eyebrows. “I did not know that.”

Tai’Mere sings, a made-up tune: “Nine-teen-fifty-eeeeeight.”

“Shhhhh,” McCrary says.

He goes back to his work. The electric lights buzz; someone is typing; McCrary speaks in a low voice with another student. Another moment goes by.

Tai’Mere sings: “Nin-ten-dooooooh.”

He continues to punctuate the quiet with outbursts, comments, scraps of songs. When he finishes reading, he asks permission to use a laptop so he can research African-American attorneys for a report. I suggest Eric Holder, the former attorney general of the U.S.

“No, I want someone black,” he says.

“He is black,” I tell him, but Tai’Mere chooses Michelle Obama because she is “both a woman and a lawyer.” He reads Wikipedia for the next 30 minutes, with occasional outbursts of “WHERE’S HARVARD?” and “IS SHE REALLY ONLY 51?” tossed over his shoulder, more comments than actual posed questions.

The other kids ignore him. McCrary shushes him half-heartedly, smiling at his enthusiasm when he isn’t looking. At 4:30, Rosado pokes her head in the door. “Ready for squash?” she asks, and Tai’Mere slams the computer shut. Crystalina places her homework into her backpack, smiles, and goes to line up behind him.

***

“I work on the Hill, my family lives on the Hill, they go to school on the Hill,” says Temie Thompson. “Technically, we just sleep in another neighborhood.”

Born and raised in the Hill District, she has based her life there — even though a recent raise at work disqualified her family from their income-based housing. As a result, the Thompson family moved to another neighborhood last fall. She wants to move back as soon as they can figure out housing. Her voice is full of conviction when she adds, “We’re from the Hill. I’m from the Hill District.”

“Me too,” adds Tai’Mere, who is sitting nearby.

His little brother, who is playing the corner, lifts his head and chimes in, “Me too!” I can hear the sense of belonging. They are knit into the neighborhood; Temie admits that it’s not an easy place to grow up, but her daily life and her community are there. Leaving is difficult and undesirable.

But leaving is what the SCS kids will do, eventually. That idea bothered me: was this weird sport dividing kids from their neighborhood? Then I talked to Leroy Dillard.

“It isn’t weird,” he admonished me. “It’s a beautiful game. Youth today need other activities besides basketball, basketball, basketball.” A coach in the Pittsburgh school system for four decades, Dillard was born and raised in the Hill District. He has no involvement with Steel City Squash, but he knows sports, and he knows the Hill. Good athletic programs are not about the identity of who runs them, he says, but about the attitude of the coach. “They don’t have to come from the Hill District… it’s just that they have to know how to deal with the kids,” he told me. “You have to know where they’re coming from.” Like Brandy Williamson, Coach Dillard doesn’t think of squash as different or weird; it’s just another option.

When Tai’Mere proclaims, “I felt like this was gonna be my sport,” part of what a good coach has to do is grant him that. It is his sport. Tai’Mere is not borrowing squash from the Ivy League. He is not trying it out in order to see if he fits into that world; he doesn’t even know where Harvard is. His vocabulary is entirely personal: I like this. This is mine. My sport. To place identity markers onto him — this is a weird sport for you — is almost an act of severance – of denying him a prior claim, stripping him of something he’s already sunk his teeth into.

Setting new goals, whether they be athletic or academic or personal, is one way of claiming identity. Tai’Mere and Crystalina are beginning to shape their own hopes for the future, and if those goals sometimes conflict with their peers’ expectations or the expectations of the outside world, that’s not their problem. Their only job, as middle school students, is to establish and expand the boundaries of their own expectations for themselves. Crystalina, for example, has thought about joining the army to help her see the world. We are mixing dough, our hands caked in flour, when I suggest that she could become an army doctor. She scrunches up her face.

“Yeah, but then I have to go to school for doctor…ing.”  Still hesitant, she asks, “Isn’t there something like docterette…a doctory diploma?”

“Oh a doctorate!”

“Yeah, my friend’s mom went to school for a doctorette… I think that’s the word. But that’s too long. I could go to school for a long time, but I gotta pay for it.” But she looks thoughtful, and later, when the cake is in the oven, tells me that she has been teaching herself Mandarin Chinese, and that she wants to go to Alaska. For a kid who has carefully stuck to the delineated boundaries of her own neighborhood, she is starting to think outside the box.

Valeria McCrary thinks exposure to new opportunities is an advantage the SCS students can return home with: “Don’t forget about where you came from. Even though you can leave your home and get your education, come back and make change to your community.”

For the kids in SCS, leaving the Hill District is still a long way away. Decisions about college are distant. For right now, they have to worry about drawing a Sumerian wheel for social studies, or memorizing the word patrician, or hitting a solid serve-and-return in practice — which can be challenging enough.

In practice the next day, there’s a new recruit in the program who doesn’t know how to handle his racket; he’s flailing and whiffing. Rosado puts him in a court with Tai’Mere to run some drills. There’s a risk that Tai’Mere will get impatient and stomp off the court, or just start to yell again.

Instead, he walks over to the kid and helps him adjust his grip. “Here, hold it like this. You gotta get the grip right so that when you swing, it’s like, goin’ down, and then don’t swing all crazy. Here, like this.”

The new boy watches, unsure, and imitates the motion. There is a patience to Tai’Mere suddenly. His manic energy is gone. He knows how to do this. He has become a teacher.

I get a glimpse, in that quiet, intimate moment between two young boys bent over a racket, of how this works. Buried under the fidgeting and complaining is an unconscious map. Discipline, knowledge, and confidence have sketched new behaviors and habits, and for these kids, squash isn’t unfamiliar. It’s theirs. This is their territory, newly claimed and just barely explored: a whole world, waiting.

 

Caitlin Dwyer is a freelance writer and teacher who often writes on education. She holds a Master of Journalism degree with honors from the University of Hong Kong and a B.A. from Pomona College. Her literary journalism has appeared in Quartz, The Los Angeles Review of Books, The Asian Review of Books, and others. She is also a monthly columnist at Buddhistdoor Global.

After Midnight

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

Literary JournalismAfter Midnight

by Barney T. Haney

I thought there would be beer. A midnight curling club in the Midwest in the middle of winter? Come on. Tammy tells me again, in earnest, that curling is about the people. Inside, I groan a little. It’s Friday, opening night of the Circle City Curling Club’s spring league. I’d envisioned bearded hipsters pontificating over microbrews, pushing free tastes.

We’re at the Artic Zone Iceplex just north of Indianapolis in Westfield. The small arena hosts junior hockey leagues and open skates and, most recently, a curling club. I know next to nothing about curling. I have worn dress shoes to stand on the ice for the next two hours. Tammy, an avid curler and the club’s treasurer, leads me between the 147-foot sheets, which are far longer than they appear on television. Skippers shout for their sweepers to brush harder, willing them with the depth of their howls. Throwers launch themselves to the left and right of me. A man in a faded Superman ball cap with a salt-and-pepper ponytail cascading past his shoulder blades blurs past in an impossibly graceful yoga-like position that resembles the pigeon. Sweepers work at blinding speeds mere centimeters off the stones with sweat dripping from the ends of their noses. Stones roar down the sheets, growling like jets flying miles overhead. The vibration rumbles through the ice. There is no pause, no let up, no time to drink beer. I’d assumed that curling was a glorified version shuffleboard. This is sport!

Tammy introduces me to the club’s members. The Circle City Curling Club is very white, but otherwise covers a surprisingly vast demographic. Club members ages range from 10 to 70-plus. They are hippies, golfers, college coeds, retirees, a doctor, a chemist, an insurance auditor, a sports psychology professor, an architectural photographer, a bagpiper, those whose knees bend, and those whose knees don’t. There is a single bearded hipster among them and he turns out to be one of the most competitive.

“Why do people join?” I ask Tammy.

“I don’t know,” she says and smiles as if this is a wonderful thing, and it is.

curling-squatingIt’s impressive, this blend of generations and genders. The Friday Night League is made up of 19 males and five females. Scores are tight across the board, and the sportsmanship is uncanny. It’s been my experience that competitive sport leagues are often petri dishes for buried hostilities, but there’s not a whiff of sizing-up to be found.

Steve, a slim, middle-aged man, shows me his Apple Watch. His heartrate is 176 beats/minute. He’s burned 200 calories after a mere half hour of sweeping stones. He averages 8,000 to 9,000 steps in a match, which equates to roughly four to four and a half miles.

“Sweeping miles,” he corrects.

“I can’t feel my feet,” I tell him.

“You’d stay a lot warmer if you were working,” says Barb, a 70-year-old with a stylish short, spiky silver hairdo. Barb is an icon in the club. She and her late-husband, Jack, were instrumental in getting the CCCC started. Now she emails her kids when she gets home to tell them she made it and is drinking her Sambuca.

By the end of the night, I am exhausted. Steve finishes at 525 calories burned. A 20-something compares his Fitbit calorie count of 517. The stones are stored and brooms are packed away. We bid one other good morning and head out. On the drive back to my apartment, I pass cops clearing the revelry off the strip, the feeling slowly returning to my feet. When I get home, I Google Sambuca.

 

I am invited to a broom-stacking! Should I go? Yes.

Broom-stacking is curling code for beer drinking. It’s a weeknight and I have to teach early the next morning, but I find it disgraceful not to honor this new phrase.

The host’s smile tightens when I enter the Ram Brewery. I’m not well. She keeps one eye on me while craning her neck to locate the bouncer. The roads are a mess. On the drive, a semi coated my windshield in greasy road slush then, to my horror, the deicing washer fluid sprayed out the side of my car’s hood. I navigate the last six miles of heavy highway-traffic through a two-by-eight-inch swath, gripping the wheel so hard I think the airbag will deploy. No one is going to be here, I tell myself. I should have texted. I should have called ahead.

“I’m supposed to be meeting the curling club,” I tell her.

Her face softens. She leads me toward the riotous noise coming from the back of the bustling brewery. Around the corner in a narrow dining hall the tables have been arranged into a long row. The scene is like a village come to honor the curling gods with a fried tenderloin and stout feast. They hurl stories down this ceremonial sheet and roar with laughter.

Club President Dan introduces me to the team he’s taking to the Curling Senior National Championship in Medford, Wisconsin. Our conversation revolves around chicken feet, embryo transplants, North Dakota State football, dairy cows, southern Minnesota, inner China, fecal samples, curling on cruise ships, pension plans, hologram houses, and dedicated ice.

Competitive curling happens on two types of surfaces: arena ice or dedicated ice. Arena ice, which the CCCC curls on, is your common public skating rink ice. Often uneven, its surface tends to change from day to day, sheet to sheet. Stumbling kids’ skates leave gouges too deep for the Zamboni. These conditions are difficult for even the best of club’s curlers to overcome and make it nearly impossible to finely calibrate one’s game. Dedicated ice, on the other hand, is an art form. High-quality water is essential (reverse osmosis or deionized water is preferred), the ice is leveled, pebbled, and kept at an exact temperature for optimum stone performance. Perhaps the most significant distinction between dedicated ice and arena ice is its influence on how a curling club visualizes itself. Dedicated ice is swagger. Dedicated ice makes a club thrive. Its all-access ice time allows a club to offer “learn-to-curls” — cash and recruitment cows — at family-friendly times. It opens opportunities for hosting bonspiels (weekend-long curling tournaments) which bring revenue to the club and to local vendors, creating incentive for sponsorships. Most importantly, it has the potential to save the CCCC from extinction, which, Dan tells me, is a troubling reality. Attendance is down 40 percent from the fall. The late-night ice time is taking its toll. Recently the club’s board has had to shift its focus from building the club to sustaining it.

Dedicated ice would likely change the clubs’ circumstances in dramatic ways, but getting there isn’t easy. The cheaper ice-making machines start at $350,000 and the special curling Zamboni can cost $13,000. Then there’s the land, the housing facility, the insurance. It’s a Herculean task, and without strong membership the chance of a club’s acquiring dedicated ice is bleak. The Artic Zone is the fifth venue the CCCC has called home in the last 10 years. The recent return of minor league hockey to Indianapolis has rejuvenated the city’s youth and adult hockey leagues. Arenas compete for the revenues amateur hockey brings. The CCCC has been left with the choice of curling at midnight or not at all.

The ceremony at the Ram Brewery ends with hearty rounds of embrace and plans to meet again. When their ice times were better, the CCCC gathered here after curling each week to analyze their matches over cold ones. Now they meet here once a month for dinner. There’s a genuine sweetness about this that resonates with me. I clean off my windshield in the parking lot and the roads, though no less messy, somehow seem not as bad.

 

There is an open sheet this Friday night. Tammy invites my wife Molly and me to “Learn to Curl.” It’s long been a desire of Molly’s to curl. Tammy and her husband Wes, a certified instructor, will be giving us this clinic. Lisa, a petite woman in her late-50’s, who will compete with Tammy at a bonspiel in Fairbanks, Alaska, later this month, will join us for extra practice.

Wes is shy. He has the trunk of a rugby player and keeps his elbows tight to his sides as if to apologize for taking up space. Despite the cold he wears a white cotton T-shirt and black synthetic workout pants that stop short of his ankles. Tammy met him at a hockey game. He introduced her to curling. After her second lesson, they competed in a mixed-doubles bonspiel in Nashville, placing second. At their wedding, the ring bearer carried their bands down the aisle on the pad of her curling broom. Tonight, Wes seems nervous. It is obvious that he has a specific idea in mind, and that things must be just right: “Please, Barney, stand over here. Just a little more, please. Stand over here. Now over here.”

I feel as if I’m having my picture taken. I move a step to the left then another then another. I don’t dare laugh, nor do I look at Molly, who I know is busting up inside. I step to the right and, thinking that I am back where I started, I move to the left a little.

“Over here, please,” Wes says. I step over there.

In 2010, watching the Winter Olympic curling from our couch in Lake Charles, Louisiana, I tell Molly, this is our chance. My dream of Olympic Gold suddenly seemed tangible. Schuster’s American team looked bad. Curling looked easy.

Now, six years later, with a stone finally in hand and my foot snug against the hack, the sweet scent of gold returns to my nostrils. I rear back, push off, and immediately lose control of my body, wobbling as helplessly as a toddler, my legs begin to spread further and further apart, an unpleasant strain makes itself known in my nether region, and just before I fall flat on my face, I desperately heave the stone forward only to watch it stop short of the hog line—the required distance to count as playable.

“That’s alright!” Wes yells from the opposite end of the sheet.

Curling is far more challenging than it seems. Learning how to deliver a stone reminds me of learning how to pitch a baseball. All that concentration on form and movement only to see that ball fly out the side of my hand. My next stone torches the house, threating Wes’s ankles. A little less weight, he coaches. Don’t forget to turn the handle, Lisa says. Ten to 12. Two to 12. Balance, Wes says. Get your butt up. My legs tremble from the strain and a tender bruise is forming on the inside of my left knee.

Molly, a former hurdler and triple jumper, goes next. It is my job to sweep for her, naturally. Here I think I will do well. Sweeping is something I’ve done plenty of.

“Harder!” Wes shouts from behind the house. “Harder!”

My pressure or pace? I don’t know. Panic sets in. The eyes of the club are upon me. My broom head is going to foul the stone any second. Get closer, Lisa says. Sweep faster. The 147-foot sheet turns into the road to forever. By the time I make it to the end of the sheet I’m pulling my coat off. Sweat runs down my legs. Steve’s Apple watch is full of shit. This is far more taxing. Molly’s stone sits in the house’s 4-foot ring — what an angel. I’m winded and my legs burn from the awkward shuffling. She goes on to throw a house party. I stink up the place and have a ball doing it. Curling takes precision and balance and calibration. My brain and body can’t quite put it together. Lisa, who’s been encouraging all night, looks me square in the eye and says that my struggles are probably due to weak thighs. Thank you, Lisa.

 

Late-season and club attendance is down. Those that show move languidly toward the nearest chair with little more than a grunt of hello. We’re watching “Curling Night in America” on a flat screen in the breakroom, waiting for public skate to end. A man with winter in his beard laments that moments earlier he was watching this in his living room, warm and in a comfy chair. Below us, on the ice, the teens couple-skate to Journey’s “Faithfully” under cosmic black lighting and spinning strobes. Ceaseless waves of shrills crash upon the rafters. Somewhere down in that beautiful chaos a drop of sweat forged by the heat of two young palms is freezing on the ice. Curling cannot compete with this in Indianapolis. Not yet. The Butler University team arrives trailed by a student film crew. Their energy is electric, but separate. They don’t interview any of the other club members; not that anyone seems to mind. Some subs show up, including a College National Champion from the University of Tennessee, who raises some eyebrows and a few grumbles. The skin under Tammy’s eyes has turned a shade darker since I’ve met her. She talks financial strategy with Adam, a fundraiser at nearby Wabash College. They’ve located a potential space at a casket warehouse.

“I told the board members I will take change,” Tammy says. “Clean out your piggy banks!”

The club is desperate to have dedicated ice before the 2018 Winter Olympics. Olympic-generated interest has historically created significant spikes in curling club memberships across the country. It’s what inspired the CCCC founders. But even ardent supporters find it hard to overlook a midnight playing schedule. The club is making a high-stakes gamble, but it may soon lose itself if not for attempting the impossible. Tammy tells me they’ve raised $50,000. If they can double it by the end of 2016, they hope to start bidding on facilities.

Hope can be a source of tension. Tonight it’s getting the better of Tammy. I ask Jeff, the club’s co-founder, about the possibility that their dedicated ice vision is “A Field of Dreams” fantasy. If you build it, I ask, will they come? He tells me a story about nagging a sports editor at The Indianapolis Star to do an article on the club in 2009.

“I kept calling him, saying, ‘Hey, we’re curling and, you know, do you need a story?’ He said, ‘Nah, eh, and uh,’ then finally he says, ‘Look, it’s a rainy day story.’ Well, a month or two later, it was just pouring down outside, right? So, I get on the phone and I call him and I’m like, ‘Hey, look out your window.’ So, he relented. He said, ‘Fine, fine, fine.’ So they came out and they did a story on us and it became a big front page deal on a Friday or Saturday, I can’t remember, but, man did it get a lot of play. We had a curling clinic promoted in the article, scheduled for two or three weeks later. Typically, for a clinic we get between 15 to 20 people, so we estimated for like maybe 50 to 60 people coming. I think we had between 250 to 300 show up; I lost count. We had two hours for that clinic. It was basically, walk on the ice, this is what a curling stone looks like, next! We didn’t have a chance, we didn’t have a prayer of doing anything. We had no clue that it was going to be that popular. It’s funny. A lot of our members were at that clinic.”

Later, I will find out that Jeff contacted every last person who came that day and rescheduled individual curling clinics for those who were still interested. Impossibility be damned—I like their chances of getting dedicated ice.

The last of the teens return their skates. The Zamboni slugs over the ice leaving a slick trail behind it. I stay until the hacks are screwed down, then wish them luck and head for the exit. I’m 10 feet from the door, when someone bangs the on the Plexiglas behind me. Two of Jeff’s teammates haven’t shown, they’ve got a sub on the way, but would I curl a couple of ends till she gets here?

What the hell.

To be fair, I give them full disclosure about my lack of ability. They smile and nod. The tiredness they had in the breakroom is gone now that we’re on the ice. You’re up first, they say. I get my right foot in the hack, butt up, eyes forward. I don’t think about it. Jeff gives me a target and thrust: I am balance and grace. The stone rotates in a fine arc as if the ice is a canvas, the line a painter’s stroke. Into the house it goes, finding a cozy little room in the front half of the 4-foot diameter, igniting an explosion of heckling. My stone scores the lone point of the first end. The next end, I place one on the rim of the button, then set a guard. Again, my stone scores. It’s glorious, this feeling. I don’t want it to end. Jeff’s sub shows up and—best of all—it is Lisa. I’m all redemption song: “Look at what these weak thighs did!” I yell and point at the scoreboard.

“I’m sorry,” she says, confusion in her watery eyes, “do I know you?”

 

Barney T. Haney teaches English at the University of Indianapolis and is an editorial assistant for Sport Literate. His work has appeared in Fiction Writers Review and Mid-American Review.

To learn more about  the Circle City Curling Club, check out their website.

 

Lessons Learned with Robert Lipsyte

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

SL Interview

Lessons Learned with Robert Lipsyte

by William Meiners

Maybe these are the end of times. The Cubs and the Indians in the World Series. The absurdity of a presidential election where the GOP’s best offering makes Charlie Sheen seem like a reasonable man — Winning! Or not. I’m on the lookout for those galloping four horsemen, though hopefully after the Cubbies make their own history.

I thought a lot about Robert Lipsyte thislipsyte-book summer, when I saw him in the O.J. documentary, and speaking of his days covering Muhammad Ali for the New York Times. If writers need role models (and why wouldn’t we?), Lipsyte would be one of mine. I shared our Ali-covered “22nd Summer” issue with him and reached out for an interview. His perspective — in a dozen answers to follow — shows he’s a man for all times, past, present, and forthcoming.

William Meiners: Between the insanity of the current presidential election and some turbulent times in an Olympic year, I suspect you’ve had a few flashbacks to 1968. Nearly half a century later, do you think we’re just rolling through some cyclical part of history or could the United States be grappling with longstanding problems that just seem insurmountable?
Robert Lipsyte: Both. We haven’t come close to solving those problems although we’ve certainly seen enough progress to make the choirs brave. We understand and in some cases even acknowledge how far we need to go in giving all Americans, especially women, African-Americans, and the poor a fair deal. I keep coming back to my Dad’s line: “Everybody should pull themselves up by their own boot straps, but it’s up to society to make sure everyone starts out with a pair of boots.” I think sports sometimes gives us a false picture of progress — there are so many rich and celebrated African-American men in football and basketball — but the injustices continue. Which puts more pressure on black athletes to step up and white athletes to support them.

WM: At the end of August, you wrote about one particular flashback, actually a great article in Slate. Recalling Tommie Smith and John Carlos, you said Colin Kaepernick’s not standing (subsequently taking a knee) for the national anthem was the “boldest display of athletic activism since the 1968 black-power salute in Mexico.” With several football players following suit, as well as a diverse group of women from other sports, do you think this is the beginning of reactivated activism in sports?
RL: A few months later, I still hope so, that this is the Athletic Revolution Redux. Smith, Carlos, and Ali were commercially crushed for their principles, none of them got their corporate endorsement due, and the athletes who followed took note and allowed themselves to be co-opted. They became shoe salesmen. My current optimism is based on the WNBA standing up with T-shirts and protests, and high school football teams taking a Kaepernick, which tells me there are thinking young players out there and progressive coaches allowing them to express themselves.

WM: Much of the reaction to Kaepernick, besides twisting his protest into a slam against military men and women, focused on the idea of “shut up and play,” or go sit on the bench. The suggestion perhaps being that he’s achieved beyond the status quo, so he should be happy with that. What impresses you most about his protest and how might his actions help in not just inspiring others, but also fostering change?
RL: Years ago, I covered a high school team whose middle linebacker came out as gay. When one of the players complained about having to undress and shower with a gay teammate, the captain said, “You’re a football player, just suck it up.” That’s always stuck with me. That’s what they’re supposed to do. We’re drawn to these players for their physical courage, which they’re proud of, but what about their moral courage? Suck it up, the way activists, single moms, the disabled, do every day. When football players suck it up it’s usually to hide pain or injury so they don’t lose their jobs. Suck it up when a principle is on the line. That’s what Kaepernick did. “Shut up and play” is for wimps.

WM: From best-selling jerseys to death threats, Kaepernick has become a focal point in this polarizing debate over issues brought forth by the Black Lives Matter movement. He kind of joked (at least hoping it wouldn’t happen), that someone murdering him would only prove his point. Of course, recent fatal police shootings in Tulsa and Charlotte continue to illustrate the problem. How can athletes bridge a gap in what seems like such a great divide?
RL: We all have responsibilities as citizens, but jocks live off the fantasies of fans, the illusion that they are special. Well, act special, at least help get the dialogue going. The danger, of course, for them is that fans see their humanity and the illusions are spoiled, better they should remain video game heroes, replaceable avatars with sportswriter back stories.

WM: The start of the NBA, which is even more of a “Black League” than the NFL, is upon us. What, if any, protests, do you anticipate? Do you think the league will try to suppress them?
RL: I’m watching this with great interest. Carmelo Anthony’s call for involvement using that powerful Instagram picture of the great black athletic activists — Ali, Jim Brown, Bill Russell, Kareem — was a reminder that there have been heroes who were willing to take risks. LeBron followed that up with a few others at the ESPY’s. Now we have to see if they are true activists or just yak-tavists, dribbling through the zeitgeist. Pro basketball players are probably in the best position to create change — the owners know they could start their own league if need be.

WM: I’m all for free speech. Let them pry the pen from my cold, dead hand. I don’t have a gun. But that means knowing that even misinformed (downright stupid) speech is allowed in this country. For some reason that makes me think of Jake and Elwood Blues running the Illinois Nazis off a bridge. I would hope most people would want to run Illinois Nazis off a bridge. But they’ve got a right to congregate. With the baseball season winding down we saw Steve Clevenger, a second-string catcher from the Seattle Mariners, suspended for the rest of the season for making insensitive remarks about protestors in Charlotte on a private Twitter account. His words actually echo a lot of what you might hear on Twitter and Facebook. Is this a double standard for two second-string signal callers?
RL: Clevenger is an exemplar of the dark side of wanting athletes to step up and speak their minds (see Curt Schilling, John Rocker.) They tend to be reactionary and ignorant (not stupid) from having existed in the tunnel of their games since they were kids, owned by rich men, and taught to roll over for alpha males. Interesting that most of the fools are white. Suspending a second-string catcher on the DL for the rest of the season in September looks better than it is. I was surprised that there was no reprisal against Kaepernick, although pleased. I think he’s a hero. I also think that he represents a coming generation who wants to do the right thing. I sense Trump — who in many ways is a model of Jock Culture’s underside of bullying, intimidation, know-nothingness — has disgusted many people and managed to make them uncomfortable with a magnified reflection of their own selfishness and bigotry.

WM: You and I first talked for a Sport Literate interview in 2000. That particular issue featured “Christmas City, U.S.A.” — Michael McColly’s basketball essay which is really about racism. There was another essay about the rise and fall of Mike Tyson. For the first time, in our pages anyway, we gave some voice to issues concerning social justice. As a young journalist for the New York Times, did you make a deliberate decision to be a “progressive writer,” or did your voice somehow shape the things you wrote about?
robert_lipsyte-head-shotRL: That’s a good question I’ve been trying to answer for myself these past 50 years. I was not an avid sports fan growing up, my parents were totally unaware of sports (maybe they knew about Jackie Robinson). They were New York City public school teachers in Harlem and black Brooklyn, whose dinner table conversations were about inequality and the quest for social justice through education. So I came to the Times at 19, as a copyboy, with a flair for feature-writing and not much sports history or x’s and o’s expertise. I got a lot of freedom at the paper, became a columnist relatively quickly, and so picked my own stories, or at least chose the way I would approach them. Being sent to the 1964 Cassius Clay — Sonny Liston fight was the big break of my career, got me attention and set the course. Through Ali and the book I wrote with Dick Gregory (“Nigger”) I met Malcolm and leaders in the movement and solidified the attitude with which I came into sports. It was no deliberate decision for me to see thoroughbred horse racing and NASCAR as models of class in America, it just seemed plain. Look down at floor during a Final Four and see that something like 80 percent of the players are black and they represent 80 percent white schools. I did try to remind myself that sometimes a cigar is just a cigar (I could get interested in courses for horses and restrictor plates), but I think most writers are directed by a GPS deep in their psyches, unless they are just doing shtick.

WM: You covered Muhammad Ali all the way back to his Cassius Clay days. From a pure charismatic standpoint, has there been another athlete who could touch him? If not, who has come close?
RL: I’ve always thought Billie Jean King was the most important athlete of the 20th century; consider her impact on half the world’s population for starters. Charisma? How do you measure that? She was as much fun to be around as Ali, and her impacts on ending shamateurism and opening the discussion of LGBTQ matters were enormous. She came close.

WM: In that 2000 interview, you talked about Ali being such a perfect match for the times. He simply reacted, often with great humor, to what was thrown at him. Do you think he may have been an accidental activist? Other than keeping him out of the ring in his prime, what did his three-year ban from fighting do for his legacy?
RL: Those three-plus years changed him from an uneducated boxer and dogmatic follower of the Nation of Islam to a man who came to understand his world. The only way he could make a living was on the college circuit. He was boring in the beginning, but he listened to the questions and learned from them.  By the end of his exile, when he said things like he didn’t want to be another black man sent by white men to kill brown men for a country that did not give him full rights, he knew what he was talking about.

WM: You never pulled any punches writing about Ali, speaking to the cruelty in which he mercilessly hammered boxers who called him Clay and perhaps abandoning his friendship with Malcolm X. Yet everything in his life, including some three decades of living with Parkinson’s disease, formed his life story. As someone who helped share the stories of one of the famous men in history, what do you think were Ali’s three greatest accomplishments?
RL: Besides the pure joy he gave as the most entertaining athlete of our time? One — Growing Up —  Being open and able to change and develop. Two — Staying Sweet — He was incredibly warm and kindly to his fans. Three — Suffering with Gallantry — He was the championship model for being a patient with unself-consciousness and dignity.

WM: I thought “O.J.: Made in America” was a stunning documentary, really putting into historical perspective all the turmoil between the Los Angeles Police Department and the city’s residents of color. Of course, it’s hard not to view O.J. Simpson as a Shakespearean hero in his own rise and fall. In that sense, what was O.J.’s tragic flaw?
RL: What was Othello’s tragic flaw? Jealousy? Pride? Self-deception? I think you’re right about O.J. as a Shakespearean hero, mostly in the context of the new documentary, a brilliant piece of film-making. But there were also more mundane flaws and they were obvious early, especially his neediness to be accepted, even loved by white men with power whose own sense of masculinity was enhanced by being in O.J.’s presence, under the testosterone shower, whether it was in movies, sports TV or Hertz commercials. They understood, if O.J. didn’t, that he worked for them, at their sufferance. O.J. was a faithless, abusive husband, and an ingratiating, accessible subject for journalists, not exactly a heroic balance. I found him easy copy, likeable, enormously cooperative, and narrowly self-absorbed — the same traits I found in Trump as a subject in the Eighties and Nineties — which made both of them, in my mind, suspect. (Chalk that up to Journalist self-doubt rather than prescience.)

WM: Ali and O.J. were contemporaries, but I don’t suspect they ran in the same circles. Yet they were superstar celebrity athletes decades before our “celebrity-obsessed” culture. How were they alike? How were they different? What lessons could each offer today’s “trending” athletes?
RL: O.J. was the alt.-Ali, also a soothing antidote to Brown, Russell, all those hard black athletes who intimidated white Americans with their uncompromising senses of self. O.J. was a grinner (see Magic Johnson), saying you’re O.K. with me to the white fans who wanted to think they were colorblind while also feeling good about themselves for bestowing their tolerance on a black man who pretended to love them back. Ali, who never denied his blackness (his put-downs of Joe Frazier’s hair, skin and facial features is a different, fascinating topic) loved everybody in a narcissistic way, while O.J. loved only his fantasy version of himself. Cautionary lessons for other athletes? First, get to be the best in your game, two, offend no one, three, make a pile and hold onto it. In other words, Be Like Mike. I’d like to think that for many of the new, more thoughtful breed of athlete, that’s no longer enough.

Robert Lipsyte, a former ESPN ombudsman, was a longtime New York Times sports columnist.

William Meiners, a freelance writer and teacher, is the editor of Sport Literate.

Safe At Home

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

Safe At Home

 by Charles W. Brice

For Malik Hamilton

Last night, Andrew McCutchen, “Cutch” to us, slammed a tough one
into right field that hopped happily over Minnesota’s Eddie Rosario’s
left shoulder and dribbled onto the wall where Rosario, like the lame god
Hephaestus (what was he thinking?), took his sweet time retrieving the orb,
while Cutch, speedy as Apollo’s chariot, rounded third base and smashed
into the Twin’s Mount Olympus in the earthly form of Edwardo Nunez.

Their collision made the Hadron Collider blush and set the Richter Scale
thumping. The men who used to be in blue, but are now in gray,
called interference on Mount Olympus and sent our Pittsburgh Apollo
to the safety of home plate. Later, Cutch made poetry of the event,
“Definitely a foul there,” he said. “Fifteen yard penalty, roughing the passer,
automatic first down.” Andrew, our passer, was safe at home,

as I hope he is tonight and all the nights of his young life. I hope
he avoids the men in black who threw Eric Garner, Samuel Dubose,
Jonny Gammage, Walter Scott, John Crawford III, Dontre Hamilton,
and so many African American men out of the game forever,
out before they got to third base — passers, under
the lights of this long American night.

 

Charlie Brice is a recovering psychoanalyst. His first poetry collection, Flashcuts Out of Chaos, was published by WordTech Editions in June, 2016. His poetry has appeared in The Atlanta Review, Avalon Literary Journal, The Paterson Literary Review, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Spitball, VerseWrights, The Writing Disorder, and elsewhere. He is an International Merit Award winner in the Atlanta Review’s Poetry 2015 International Poetry Competition, and his poem, “Wild Pitch,” was named one of the 75 best poems in Spitball magazine.

What is Lost, What is Gained

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

What is Lost, What is Gained

by Laura Madeline Wiseman

Earrings, wingbacks, beads to a necklace and their string, sunglasses, bike gloves, cans of coconut water, jerky, hair rubber bands, tire pressure, energy, fear — in every communal shower in small town schools something slides down the drain. A visor, a pair of bike gloves, a set of house keys, remain somewhere in the grass. Slide out of jersey and an unidentifiable object bounces to tent floor. On such rides, everyone is stripped of riches, reduced to the body, the tongue, to the necessary speech, the hook.

Laura Madeline Wiseman is the author of 22 books and chapbooks and the editor of Women Write Resistance: Poets Resist Gender Violence, selected for the Nebraska 150 Book List. Her collaborative book with artist Sally DeskinsIntimates and Fools, is a Nebraska Book Award 2015 Honor Book. Her book Drink won the 2016 Independent Publisher Bronze Book Award for poetry. Her recent collections are An Apparently Impossible Adventure and Leaves of Absence. Her essay “Seven Cities of Good” was an honorable mention in Pacifica Literary Review’s 2015 Creative Nonfiction Award. She teaches at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

ON THE REBOUND WITH RUS BRADBURD

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

SL Interview

On the Rebound with Rus Bradburd
by William Meiners

Rus Bradburd is a pretty giving guy. About a decade ago, I traveled with Nick Reading (Sport Literate’s own Nick Reading) to Las Cruces, New Mexico to see our old Purdue buddy Kevin Honold, a guy, like us, then working on his second MFA at New Mexico State. Rus, a writing mentor to Kevin, loaned him his red pickup truck for our weeklong stay.

I got to know him a little more through three books he’s written. A college coach who worked for both Don Haskins (the real man behind “Glory Road”) and Lou Henson, Rus left the hardwood and life on the recruiting trail for his own MFA program and a gym rat’s commitment to the writing craft. Three years ago, Rus judged our essay contest, submitting himself then to an interview about his first book of fiction, Make It, Take It. And in the spirit of renewed March Madness, he recently subjected himself to the interview that follows.

William Meiners: As a former college basketball coach who made the jump to writing, your first three books were about basketball, though all very different. The first, Paddy on the Hardwood, is a memoir, maybe even an example of a traveler’s narrative as you document your time as a semi-pro basketball coach in Ireland. Forty Minutes of Hell is the biography of Nolan Richardson, the somewhat controversial and misunderstood basketball coach. For the latter, it seems you had to turn into an investigative journalist and a historian just to uncover the story. Can you talk about your approaches to each of these examples of creative nonfiction?
Rus Bradburd: The Irish book began as a diary because I feared I was going crazy. “Nobody would believe this stuff back in the States, I’ve got to write this down,” that sort of thing. And although we came in last place, from a literary standpoint that was a very lucky coincidence, and that worked well in the book. In the early drafts of Paddy on the Hardwoodthere was no basketball, nothing on the court. But I had a few writer pals tell me I had to have some basketball. I had to dig up the stats, and in Ireland the records are very spotty. Also, frankly, I cheated on the order of things, meaning I moved the Irish music stuff around, staggered it throughout the book so there’d be a balance, a back and forth, between music and the team.
With Forty Minutes of Hell I began in a very different way than the final results might indicate: I was going to “out” Nolan as a paranoid egotistical racist. Which, in retrospect, is how 99 percent of the media portrayed him when he was fired at Arkansas. But in digging up the history and background and doing dozens of interviews, I slowly came to believe that Nolan was right about nearly everything. Yet I still had to expose his imperfections, his humanity, which he wasn’t happy about. And finally, I had to hide the book from him until it hit the stores. He’s a strong personality and I feared he’d try to influence my very personal take on his life.

WM: With any form of creative nonfiction writers are trying to arrive at a truth. And of course good fiction rings truthful. What were the biggest challenges in arriving at what may seem like discovering something of yourself in Paddy and teasing out the complex life of Richardson in Forty Minutes?
RB: In Ireland I had to come to grips with basketball, the complicated history of how it had dominated my life in an unhealthy way. I think good memoir often exposes the writer as a jerk — or at least as a dope, or imperfect. Of course, this was easy to do in my case. The Nolan Richardson book made me realize the incredible privilege I’d been afforded by being white, even in a black man’s game. I mean, the history of the game points at this, but nobody wants to hear it. For example, John Wooden, the UCLA coach who won all those NCAA titles, got his start in an era where the coaching fraternity was segregated. But so did nearly all the great coaches, from Henry Iba to Bobby Knight to…well, anyone who began before Will Robinson at Illinois State in 1970. And all of us involved in sport like to imagine the games that were never played: who was better, Bill Russell or Kareem, that kind of thing. But as far as coaching is concerned, Americans were cheated out of the best games — they were never played. We never saw Clarence “Big House” Gaines against Dean Smith. And John Wooden never had to face John McLendon.

WM: Were you worried about pissing anyone off with either book? Or do you feel just have to let the writing fly and deal with that later?
RB: The great Chicago journalist John Conroy told me that there is no nonfiction book worth its salt that doesn’t anger some people. With Paddy on the Hardwood, though, it was touchy because there are people I love, and they don’t come off well in the book. Players who were decent guys look bad. I got away with it because I pointed that camera at myself. Nobody looks as foolish in that book as the author. I think with the Nolan Richardson book, well, he’s such a lightening rod for controversy that I knew there’d be no way to make everyone happy on doing his story. And I avoided the star players who I felt like would feed me standard lines. Instead I talked to people who had no voice, or at least weren’t his best players, or the obvious choices but would speak in cliché.

WM: We last spoke (formerly in the SL Q&A sense, anyway) not too long after Make It, Take It, your novel of linked basketball stories came out. At the time, you told me writing fiction seemed more difficult. Is it still tougher a few years later? And what makes it so?
RB: This question looks to me like a banana peel up ahead on the sidewalk that I’m so dumb I’ll still trip over it. Fiction, in my case, involves no research, no facts, no interviews. I imagine that Cormac McCarthy has to get things right if he’s portraying Mexico in 1940, but I don’t have to fret. It’s all in my head. So I think what I’m up to in nonfiction is that I’m collecting all this stuff I found buried, and now I’m deciding what to keep and what to throw away and how to lay it on this big wooden table and make shapely design. And I’m looking for patterns that surprise, or threads I didn’t know existed. So in that way, it feels like more work, that I have so much to sift through and my challenge is not to make it too long of a book. With fiction, I often feel like I need more advice. I don’t know the material well enough, as strange as that sounds. So I lean on Robert Boswell, Antonya Nelson, and a yet-unpublished Chicago writer who has saved me so often named Barry Pearce. And after some back and forth with them, I can finally show my best work to my wife, the poet Connie Voisine.

WM: What does Connie do with it?
RB: As a poet, she has an even tougher language-level take on my manuscripts than the other readers that I’ve leaned on over the years. As my wife, she gives me the thrashing I so deserve, but I’ve learned the hard way to only show her my best work. It’s less traumatic that way.

WM: After your college coaching career, you told me, you miss being around inner-city kids. What specifically do you miss most about those relationships?
RB: I found the Chicago guys I coached endlessly fascinating and I could relate to them. In retrospect, basketball gave me a window into an interesting culture: black inner-city life. Yet my view and experience with African Americans is mostly limited to the basketball world. And as a college professor now I’ve come to realize that while the coaches are intensely interested in recruiting tall black guys, the rest of the university is apathetic to this portion of the population. Studies show that the racial diversity on many campuses is pretty sad — away from football and basketball. Sport is the leader in racial progress, and it’s often the only place you’ll see it on a college campus.

WM: Of course, one of the players you still talk a lot about is Shawn Harrington. For those who don’t know, Shawn was a random victim of gun violence in his native Chicago. His story is both heartbreaking and inspiring (if that’s possible). In covering up his young daughter in a full-on assault on the wrong car, he saved her but ended up paralyzed. I understand you’re working on a book about his life. Why is Shawn’s story so important?
RB: I think that Shawn’s individual story cuts through all the statistics and political arguments, all the discussion of gun control, education, politics, and race, and enlarges the issues in some unexplainable way. It’s a story of the failure of America. I mean here we have a guy who did everything right: he graduated from college, got a good job, came back to his old neighborhood to try to make a difference, and was a loving and involved father with his two daughters. Now? He’s living on $300 a month. And the odd coincidence and the time of the shooting (7:40 a.m.) point to the fact that we’re all vulnerable. The working title is “All the Dreams We’ve Dreamed,” which is lifted from a Langston Hughes poem. This is another book project that uses basketball as a backdrop, but again there’s not actually much basketball in it.

WM: When I started SL 21 years ago, I figured we’d publish a number of “Field of Dreams” type stories. Those father and son, or daughter, essays that toy with the fine line of sentimentality. My wife caught me watching that movie the other night and I was practically blubbering. I mean it, she nearly went for my son’s nighttime diapers. The writer/editor in me knows what they’re doing — a pull on the heartstrings with all the music and low-key, handsome Kevin Costner about as subtle as a beanball. Still, it always gets me. And that’s sometimes the criticism of any type of writing that’s linked to sports. It’s a game of schmaltz.
This is an absurdly long introduction to a question (complete with a second paragraph), but I think we publish a range of writing about sports — from the near sentimental to things with harder edges. In the end, we just publish what we like. That said, you recently hooked us up with Dave Zirin for an interview. Zirin, I think, is sports journalism with a capital “J.” His job is, even as a true sports fan, as he told Nick, is to tell those “house on fire” stories. With Forty Minutes, you certainly detailed the ongoing racism Richardson endured. Why should writers of sport to take on bigger issues, i.e. racism and corruption?
RB: Although I’m nearly old enough to be Zirin’s father, I’ve learned so much from him, particularly about history. And I think he’s able to connect the dots that only he notices at first. In my case, I was always more interested in the stories of human endurance and courage. I remember being particularly taken as a kid with Dan Gable and his maniacal training routines, although I think Gable wrestled in the last meet I have seen. I think that kind of attraction to other stories away from the actual game, and this window into black culture that I talk about all the time, led me to be interested in the role of sport in social justice causes. And in America, that means racial equality, or less inequality, anyway. So that kind of overlap of courage and race — and then working for Don Haskins for eight years — got me looking at the kind of issues that Zirin seems to be hammering on all the time.

WM: I know you’ve been working on another fictional work about a football team that takes over a university. Though that sounds a bit like nonfiction. Can you talk a bit about that book? What’s your two-line pitch to publishers on why that book matters?
RB: Okay, here goes: “Big Time” is an anti-sports novel that satirizes the lofty place of athletics at American universities. I’ll leave at that for now, but I will add that I used to be anxious about getting it published before college sports were reformed. Sadly, that’s not going to happen anytime soon, or not in any meaningful way. But the good news is that the book may still have hope.

WM: I turned 50 late last year. For the first time ever I started teaching a creative writing course at the Saginaw Chippewa Tribal College in Mount Pleasant, Michigan, in January. I find it to be both wonderful and awful at the same time as I chatter on in what seems like some sort of performance art banter in front of my students. Mostly I try to be encouraging. How do you coach up writing?
RB: I find myself relying in class — and in dealing with young people — on what I learned from Lou Henson and Don Haskins, the Hall of Fame coaches I worked for, nearly as much as what I gleaned from Robert Boswell and Antonya Nelson. And I find a lot of similarities between writing and basketball, just in the attitude and practice. I’m pushing students to settle into the right mixture of humility and hubris. Just like in basketball, too much confidence can hurt you as much as too much fear. Also, like in basketball, you go “practice” alone, then join the group for a “pick-up game” that the workshop can be. And there’s something about being a good “team player” that makes the workshop go better for everyone, yet also helps each “player” with her own “game.” Sorry, that’s a lot of sport metaphors.

WM: Given a magic wand, a deal with the devil, or just your best career realized, what would you want the most? To be a Division 1 coach in a powerhouse basketball program? Or a writer on The New York Times bestseller list? Why?
RB: Not even close: I lost the energy for college coaching a year or two before I quit in 2000. I’m content that I did what I did. I was in seven NCAA tournaments by the time I was 31 years old. But the hours spent seem self involved now in ways that I find meaningless. Although that’s an odd accusation that a writer is calling coaches “self-involved.” In retrospect, what interested more about basketball was not the “X and O” strategy stuff, but the stories. I can’t really remember scores or plays, but there are unforgettable stories in my head from my time around basketball. I don’t worry about being a New York Times bestseller, thank goodness. But I’m much happier typing on a day-to-day basis than I ever was coaching.

William Meiners is the editor of Sport Literate.

Dave Zirin Interview

150 150 bjj-sportliterate

SL Interview

Dave Zirin on Sports: Two Things at Once

by Nicholas Reading

In a sports’ world that is too often reduced to top 10 lists, highlight gifs, fantasy leagues and box scores, Dave Zirin approaches athletics as what it is and has always been, a lens through which we can view both society’s successes and failures. I spoke with Dave on the Friday before the Super Bowl, discussing his love and in-depth knowledge of sports, what drives him as a writer, and of course, the NFL (see who he liked to win the big game) complete with thoughts on Cam, Peyton, and CTE. When Zirin plays, he plays for keeps. We also touched on the political nature of athletics here and abroad, TMZ, a fitting slogan for the Olympics, and what’s looming on the sports horizon.

Zirin is the sports editor for The Nation and he writes a weekly column called the Edge of Sports. A frequent contributor to ESPN, CNN, NBC, and FOX, Zirin, in my opinion, is one of the most important sports journalists today.

Nicholas Reading: You’re a bit of a rare breed. What brought you to the intersection of sports and politics as a journalist? Was there a defining moment?
Dave Zirin: Oh, my God, that’s really kind of you. What brought me to sports writing was a lifelong love of sports. I grew up playing sports, I grew up memorizing everything about sports, and it’s something that has always meant everything to me. It’s been an essential part of my life. When I got into politics, one of the things that was interesting to me was that all of the things I thought I knew about sports were all of sudden under a different kind of lens – just some of the basic narratives that I thought I knew about – people like Jackie Robinson, Muhammad Ali, the Olympics, the World Cup, everything started to look different. And it has been a very fascinating process for me. And at the point in my life I was really trying to understand if sports should be rejected or if it should be reclaimed because there is something good in sports. Or if it is really about that displacement – public funding for stadiums, racism, sexism, homophobia, and really coming to grips with the fact that sports are two things at once. It has two different traditions, good and bad, fair and foul. I’m trying to do my best to revive and dig up that tradition of social justice that does exist in sports and try to make it come alive for a new audience.

NR: Have you faced any blow back? Was anyone saying, “Just let sports be a game?”
DZ: You definitely do get some of that. And I feel it. I really feel it, and I’m sympathetic to it. I would love for sports to be ala carte. I really do wish sports were just the fun of the game and the artistry, no different from going to a play or an opera, just another form of cultural entertainment. Unfortunately, the very power of sports has made it something else. If I wasn’t talking about it it’s not like these things would cease to exist. The Washington football team would still be called the Redskins. The St. Louis Rams would still be moving to Los Angeles. These things would still be happening. To call out these things, and it’s not just me to doing this; I’m not some kind of lone wolf. But to say the house is on fire is not the same as being an arsonist. We’re not setting the house on fire. It’s burning independently of us. And pointing it out, that the fire is raging, is a prerequisite to putting that damn fire out. Not just reveling in the fact that the world is burning.

NR: I have to ask about Cam Newton. You wrote your own open letter, which I thought was great, and recently Cam has said, without reservation, that he felt a part of the criticism he has received is because he is African American. Will these comments open eyes or just make more folks deny any racism?
DZ: Well, it’s interesting because his exact words were that he is an African-American quarterback that no one has seen before. We have gotten past the point where it has been normalized to have African American quarterbacks. I mean, Russell Wilson has been in the last two Super Bowls, for goodness sake. What Cam Newton is trying to say is that he is going to be authentically himself, even if it puts people on edge. And that means he’s going to keep smiling, keep celebrating, he’s going to keep being him. He was acknowledging that makes people afraid, but it’s actually an important thing to address. He has to still be himself. It reminded me so much of another athlete who was also very clear that he was going to be himself and that is Muhammad Ali, who said “I don’t have to be what you want me to be” early in his career. That was his great statement of independence. Now I’m not comparing Cam Newton to Muhammad Ali in full. Ali risked years in prison opposing the Vietnam War, all manner of hate and death threats and all the rest of it. But in the 21st century it is still very liberating for a lot of people to have Cam Newton be willing to be himself in a manner that can be described as unafraid. It’s still rare, it’s still powerful in his willingness to do that and it’s making him friends and enemies all over the place.

NR: Not to be too NFL heavy…
DZ: No, that’s okay. It’s funny that you don’t want to be NFL heavy. Sometimes people ask me why I cover the NFL. The NFL is so hegemonic in the US sports world that to be a sports and politics writer and not talk about the NFL should be utterly irrelevant; it is basically to not be a sports writer. Eighty of the top 100 sport shows watched last year were all NFL games. I mean, it’s not even close. So, I have no problem with you being NFL heavy. If we’re talking sports and politics this is the number one discussion in town.

 

NR: This has to do with CTE. Antwaan Randle El recently came forward and expressed his feelings that he wouldn’t play football again if given the chance due to his physical and mental ailments. Calvin Johnson is retiring at 30. What’s your opinion on the future of the NFL and when do fans value players’ health and future as much as our own?
DZ: It’s interesting because we really are at a point where the NFL has an existential problem. The journalist James Reston once said that the press is much better at covering revolution rather than evolution, and I think that’s what we are looking at here in that the popularity of the NFL is evidence that it’s not going anywhere this year, next year, five years from now. But there is this kind of 20-year generational issue that hangs over the league, and it has to do with everything you are saying. Science is not the league’s friend. Currently we can find out about CTE, this horrific brain disease that affects NFL players who have to have these repeated sub concussive hits. Of course, it can affect anybody who gets repeated concussions, but there’s nothing quite like the NFL where if you get a concussion it never really gets the chance to heal because you are constantly in this motion of playing this sport where you are running into other people. It’s so interesting to see what the next 20 years are going to bring because the science is going to improve and we’re going to get to the point, I think very soon, where we’re going to be able to detect CTE not just in the dead, but in the living. When that happens, you might see players retiring in mass at 26, 27. Or signing release forms that they’re never going to sue. And you’re going to have parents, so many parents, and this is already happening, that prevent their kids from playing youth football. That’s why the NFL is involved in this ferocious, and utterly unprincipled PR campaign that is all about getting kids to play this sport. This is what we’re dealing with. So who knows what it’s going to look like in two- or 30 years’ time. I think that’s the CTE issue kind of at large. What’s going to happen to a sport when more and more families aren’t letting their kids play, particularly if their kids have skills at multiple sports?

 

NR: You write not only about American sports but also sports and its politics around the world. Have you noticed any differences in the manner in which athletics, or athletes, or even fans, are viewed outside the US?
DZ: Yes. It’s not that the fanaticism is any different, and I’m talking about hyper fandom, it’s really a global phenomenon and it tends to reflect whatever country it happens to be in. What it means to be a sports fanatic in Egypt is very different from what it means in Serbia, what it means in London, what it means in New York City. I’d say the biggest difference between the US and the rest of the world is what we’ve been talking about. It’s about American football versus soccer. The big difference between football and soccer is the fact that soccer, I mean, how do you monetize soccer is what marks the biggest difference. In other countries politics is less policed. When athletes are political it is less corporatized. In Greece recently two teams sat down in the middle of the field to protest the migrant crisis and had a two minute moment of silence for the children who died in the passage from Syria over the Aegean sea and the PA announcer read out their complaints. Now imagine that happening at the Super Bowl. Or at any US sporting event. I mean, you just can’t. That’s what we’re dealing with.

 

NR: Recently Johnny Manziel was in the news again for all the wrong reasons. I feel sometimes that kind of story gets more press. Where an athlete screws up or does something wrong. What athletes do serve as good role models? Who should we be looking at?
DZ: It’s so interesting because the sports industry has become this 24-hour thing and it’s being run much more from the bottom up instead of the top down. In other words, it’s being run, in terms of what’s being covered, through the Internet and social media more than it gets run by what executives think we need to know. In some ways that’s very progressive.  For example, this Peyton Manning HGH story, or violence against women, that’s happened from the bottom up. Or the controversy over the Washington football team name. That has happened from the bottom up. Not from the top down. And that’s great. But what also happens is that profits get governed by clicks and by attention and by eyeballs because there is so much competing for attention. It’s just proven by these scandals what generate clicks, more than an athlete’s social consciousness, more than charity work, and all the rest of it. So that’s what I think creates this gutter culture. This US magazine of sports. Where TMZ can start its sports site and can have it be very popular very quickly because it is willing to dwell on these kinds of scandals. Which aren’t illustrative or indicative of how most athletes are living their life. But it is what draws the most attention.

 

NR: As a sports journalist, what is the state of the profession? Is it where it should be or has it been reduced to sound bites and 90-second highlight clips?
DZ: That’s exactly right. It’s so crazy, man. I mean the sound bite culture, the 140-character culture, the twitter culture, it makes it very difficult, sometimes, to talk about the more substantive issues. But, at the same time it makes a broader audience. And an audience that feels they are being under-served by this culture. So if anybody is listening out there, who is an aspiring sports writer, I would just say, don’t be afraid to be counter intuitive. Because there are a lot of people who do feel that they are under-served by this climate, where everything is TMZ and the rest of it.

 

NR: What sports writers do you go to? What outlets do you go to for your sports journalism?
DZ: There’s a lot out there. For me, honestly, it usually governed more by stories than by individual writers. The work by people like Jessica Luther who has a real focus on the issue of violence against women in sports, or the work by people like Christopher Gaffney, who has been covering what has been happening in Brazil with the World Cup and the Olympics. That’s the kind of stuff that I look for. What is great about this moment is that anybody can write these stories and put them up. So there’s a lot of good out there. Sports Illustrated’s new website Cauldron is really good. Medium is really good. Sports on Earth still puts good stuff up. Vice Sports, Patrick Hruby’s stuff, there’s no shortage of things for people to find. And I would suggest people search on the basis of the issue more than on the basis of the writer. Then they can discover some of these new writers who are cropping up all the time.

 

NR: A few questions about your writing. Obviously your love of sports brought you to your profession, but what brought you to writing?
DZ: For me, and for a lot of people who write, it’s just the desire for some form of self-expression. Usually we read books that really touched us. For me it was reading James Baldwin and just seeing the power of words. And then when I read James Baldwin’s articles about Sonny Liston as he prepared for his fight against young Cassius Clay. That for me was kind of mind blowing as far as what sports writing could be. The thing that I love about writing and what I love about being a writer is that we live in such a deeply, deeply superficial society where people are judged so quickly on what their jobs are. When you meet someone one of the first things they usually ask is what do you do and whatever answer you give is how they start to define you. And it’s really messed up if you think about it. So many of us don’t have the choice as to what our job is going to be, yet, people still define us by what they are. And being a writer, it really does not require someone else to sanction you or label you as such but you can self identify and you can work on your craft and it doesn’t really matter what else you’re doing to pay the bills.

 

NR: So who you like this weekend (still pre-Super Bowl)?
DZ: It’s interesting; this is the first Super Bowl in a while, largely because I’m such a Patriots hater, where I haven’t really been stressed about the Super Bowl! I really don’t give two craps about either team too much. But I do like the Carolina Panthers. I do like the way they play. I do like Cam Newton. I certainly don’t like the way that Peyton Manning has gotten such an unholy pass from the media about things that other quarterbacks would get roasted for and the latest HGH scandal just being the latest incarnation of the ways in which Peyton is protected by big media and the NFL. So I’d like to see the Panthers win only because I feel like it would upset all the right people. If the Broncos win I’m not going to be crying into my cheese dip on Sunday night, unlike last year when tears flowed in a manner that I’m ashamed to describe.

 

NR: If Peyton retires, win or lose, is the HGH story dead forever? If he comes back, will we hear more of it?
DZ: It all depends on new information. That’s the thing about it. And the reason I’m even talking about it now is that I’m kind of gob smacked by this new story that came out about these private investigators who went to the home of the HGH whistle blower and misrepresented themselves as police officers to the parents of this guy, Charlie Sly, who is the intern who gave the initial interview. And the day after the PIs go to their home and they call 911 and you can hear the 911 tape of the whistleblower’s sister in a very frightened manner calling 911 saying there are people here who are saying they’re police, we’re scared, and all the rest of it. But without new information the story will die. And if he retires with a victory, yeah, that’s all people are going to remember, absolutely and positively because that’s the way that sports works. But we’ll see what happens.

 

NR: Anything you’d like to add here that wasn’t covered?
DZ: Just that people should keep a very, very close eye on Brazil this year with the Olympics. I wrote a book called Brazil’s Dance With the Devil and went down to Brazil a bunch and looked at how the World Cup and the Olympics were being planned and everything that’s happening right now in Brazil with the economic crisis, with the spread of the Zika virus, and with a lot of dissatisfaction in the country as a whole. I mean this is the sort of thing that is keeping me up at night. I think about the uses of sports and I hope people keep a close eye on this because the Olympics could come to your town next and that’s not anything you want.

 

NR: That sounds ominous.
DZ: Yes. I’ve said before that the slogan for the Olympics shouldn’t be, “Bigger, Faster, Stronger,” or whatever it is. It should be, “Something wicked this way comes.”

 

NR: Well, like I said, we really appreciate you talking to us. I really enjoy reading your work.
DZ: Thank you.

Nicholas Reading is the author of the chapbook The Party In Question (Burnside Review Press, 2007) and Love & Sundries (SplitLip Press, 2014). His poetry has appeared or is forthcoming in Bat City Review, jubilat, Nimrod, Painted Bride Quarterly, and San Pedro River Review. He serves as the managing editor for Sport Literate.

  • 1
  • 2